Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;10(9):315-325.
doi: 10.1177/1756285617721092. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

Tacrolimus in the treatment of myasthenia gravis in patients with an inadequate response to glucocorticoid therapy: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in China

Affiliations

Tacrolimus in the treatment of myasthenia gravis in patients with an inadequate response to glucocorticoid therapy: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in China

Lei Zhou et al. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: To determine the efficacy of low-dose, immediate-release tacrolimus in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) with inadequate response to glucocorticoid therapy in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Methods: Eligible patients had inadequate response to glucocorticoids (GCs) after ⩾6 weeks of treatment with prednisone ⩾0.75 mg/kg/day or 60-100 mg/day. Patients were randomized to receive 3 mg tacrolimus or placebo daily (orally) for 24 weeks. Concomitant glucocorticoids and pyridostigmine were allowed. Patients continued GC therapy from weeks 1-4; from week 5, the dose was decreased at the discretion of the investigator. The primary efficacy outcome measure was a reduction, relative to baseline, in quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score assessed using a generalized linear model; supportive analyses used alternative models.

Results: Of 138 patients screened, 83 [tacrolimus (n = 45); placebo (n = 38)] were enrolled and treated. The change in adjusted mean QMG score from baseline to week 24 was -4.9 for tacrolimus and -3.3 for placebo (least squares mean difference: -1.7, 95% confidence interval: -3.5, -0.1; p = 0.067). A post-hoc analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference for QMG score reduction of ⩾4 points in the tacrolimus group (68.2%) versus the placebo group (44.7%; p = 0.044). Adverse event profiles were similar between treatment groups.

Conclusions: Tacrolimus 3 mg treatment for patients with MG and inadequate response to GCs did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint versus placebo over 24 weeks; however, a post-hoc analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference for QMG score reduction of ⩾4 points in the tacrolimus group versus the placebo group. This study was limited by the low number of patients, the absence of testing for acetylcholine receptor antibody and the absence of stratification by disease duration (which led to a disparity between the two groups). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01325571.

Keywords: immunology; myasthenia gravis; tacrolimus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: Huawei Shi is an employee of Astellas Pharma China, Inc. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient disposition. *The patient was excluded from both the full analysis set and the per-protocol set due to no assessment of quantitative MG scale at any post-baseline visit.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean QMG score with tacrolimus versus placebo over 24 weeks [FAS (LOCF)]. FAS, full analysis set; LOCF, last observation carried forward; QMG, quantitative myasthenia gravis; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Patients with clinically important improvement in QMG score (⩾4) between baseline and week 24 [FAS (LOCF)]. FAS, full analysis set; LOCF, last observation carried forward; QMG, quantitative myasthenia gravis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gold R, Schneider-Gold C. Current and future standards in treatment of myasthenia gravis. Neurotherapeutics 2008; 5: 535–541. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilhus NE. Myasthenia gravis. New Engl J Med 2016; 375: 2570–2581. - PubMed
    1. Gilhus NE, Verschuuren JJ. Myasthenia gravis: subgroup classification and therapeutic strategies. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14: 1023–1036. - PubMed
    1. Jaretzki A, Barohn RJ, Ernstoff RM, et al. Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America. Neurology 2000; 55: 16–23. - PubMed
    1. Guo J, Dang D, Li H-Z, et al. Current overview of myasthenia gravis and experience in China. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2014; 1: 127–130.

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources