Flouroscopy-free technique is safe and feasible in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones
- PMID: 28861303
- PMCID: PMC5562250
- DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.24638
Flouroscopy-free technique is safe and feasible in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to present outcomes of our patients who had undergone retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) with fluoroscopy-free technique and evaluate the efficacy and safety of the technique.
Material and methods: Between January 2013 and June 2015 the outcomes of 93 patients who had undergone RIRS with fluoroscopy-free technique were retrospectively evaluated. Our RIRS technique involved preoperative assessment of ureter by semi-rigid ureteroscope, inserting guidewire through semi-rigid ureteroscope, inserting ureteral access sheath over the guidewire with the visiual guidance of semi-rigid ureteroscope, passing flexible ureteroscope through the sheath, dusting the stone with holmium laser, rechecking the ureter with semi-rigid ureteroscope and inserting double J stent through semi-rigid ureteroscope. Low-dose computerized tomography scan was performed to all patients in postoperative first month and the results were classified as stone-free (absence of any fragment), clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) (≤4 mm) and residual stone.
Results: Study population consisted of 62 (66.6%) male and 31 (33.3%) female patients with a mean age of 47.8±14 (range 14-93) years. Mean stone size was 14.7±5 (7-32) mm. Median operative time was 72 (30-125) minutes. Stone-free rate was achieved in 65 (69.9%) patients while CIRF was achieved in 13 (13.9%) and residual stones were detected in 15 (16.1%) patients. Five patients (5.37%) had minor complications, including hematuria and fever. No major complications were observed.
Conclusion: Fluoroscopy-free technique is effective and safe technique in management of renal stone. Furthermore fluoroscopy-free technique can protect the surgeon from the negative effects of radiation.
Keywords: Flexible ureterorenoscopy; fluoroscopy; nephrolithiasis.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
References
-
- Wendt-Nordahl G, Mut T, Krombach P, Michel MS, Knoll T. Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors? Urol Res. 2011;39:185–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0331-0. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Smith RD, Patel A. Impact of flexible ureterorenoscopy in current management of nephrolitiazis. Curr Opin Urol. 2007;17:114–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e328028fe0c. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Belko DT, Denstedt JD. Advances in ureterorenoscopy. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34:397–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2007.05.003. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Shah DJ, Sachs RK, Wilson DJ. Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:1166–73. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/25026140. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet. 2004;363:345–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15433-0. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources