A comparison between two double-button endoscopically assisted surgical techniques for the treatment acute acromioclavicular dislocations

Abstract

Purpose: To compare clinical and radiological outcomes between two endoscopically assisted double-button techniques in high-grade acute acromioclavicular separations.

Methods: A retrospective single-center study was conducted in patients with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation Rockwood types III and V, from 2009 to 2014. All were treated endoscopically, with a 1-year minimum follow-up. Two consecutive series were conducted; the first (TR group) received the TightRope^® system, whereas last series (DB group) was treated with the Dog Bone^® button technology (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA). Primary endpoints were last follow-up values of Constant score (CS) and Quick-DASH (QD) score. Moreover, the posttraumatic displacement and its evolution were assessed on bilateral Zanca radiographs. A displacement of 5 mm or greater the day after surgery was considered as a lack of reduction; the same difference on last follow-up X-rays was considered as a loss of reduction.

Results: Forty patients were reviewed: 22 in the TR group and 18 in the DB group. After a mean follow-up of 27.7 ± 8.3 months, CS and QD averaged, respectively, 94.3 ± 4.4 and 2.0 ± 2.6 in the TR series, whereas they averaged, respectively, 95 ± 6.1 and 3.4 ± 3.3 in the DB series after a mean follow-up of 24.1 ± 5 months (PCS = 0.16, PQDS = 0.08). Lack of reduction and loss of reduction rates were significantly higher in the DB group, with P = 0.0005 and P < 0.0001, respectively.

Conclusions: Both techniques provided good to excellent functional outcomes. However, considering inferior radiological results using the Dog Bone^® device, we would prefer the TightRope^® device in acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Level of evidence: IV: Therapeutic study-cases series.

Keywords: Acromioclavicular instability; Arthroscopic stabilization; Button; Dog Bone; TightRope.