Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;145(4):571-572.
doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2002_16.

Choice of criterion used in the receiver operating characteristic analysis

Affiliations

Choice of criterion used in the receiver operating characteristic analysis

Farrokh Habibzadeh et al. Indian J Med Res. 2017 Apr.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Part of the receiver operating characteristic curve plotted based on the data retrieved from Fig. 2a of Ref. . The white circle corresponds to the cut-off point derived by the authors of the article. The green square corresponds to a higher cut-off value when the prior probability is considered 9 per cent (the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in general population) instead of 41 per cent (the prevalence in the referral centre where the study was conducted), and the red triangle corresponds to a lower cut-off value, when the cost of a false negative test result is assumed 10 (instead of 5) times a false positive result.

Comment in

  • Authors' Response.
    Mohan A, Reddy SA, Sachan A, Sarma KVS, Kumar DP, Panchagnula MV, Rao PVLNS, Kumar BS, Krishnaprasanthi P. Mohan A, et al. Indian J Med Res. 2017 Apr;145(4):573-574. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.213767. Indian J Med Res. 2017. PMID: 28862195 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Mohan A, Reddy SA, Sachan A, Sarma KVS, Kumar DP, Panchagnula MV, et al. Derivation & validation of glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) cut-off value as a diagnostic test for type 2 diabetes in south Indian population. Indian J Med Res. 2016;144:220–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Habibzadeh F, Habibzadeh P, Yadollahie M. On determining the most appropriate test cut-off value: the case of tests with continuous results. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2016;26:297–307. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF. The inconsistency of “optimal” cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:670–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sox HC, Higgins MC, Owens DK. Medical decision making. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
    1. Habibzadeh F, Yadollahie M. Number needed to misdiagnose: A measure of diagnostic test effectiveness. Epidemiology. 2013;24:170. - PubMed