Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 1;7(9):111.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci7090111.

Problems in Classifying Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): One or Multiple Syndromes?

Affiliations

Problems in Classifying Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): One or Multiple Syndromes?

María Del Carmen Díaz-Mardomingo et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

As the conceptual, methodological, and technological advances applied to dementias have evolved the construct of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), one problem encountered has been its classification into subtypes. Here, we aim to revise the concept of MCI and its subtypes, addressing the problems of classification not only from the psychometric point of view or by using alternative methods, such as latent class analysis, but also considering the absence of normative data. In addition to the well-known influence of certain factors on cognitive function, such as educational level and cultural traits, recent studies highlight the relevance of other factors that may significantly affect the genesis and evolution of MCI: subjective memory complaints, loneliness, social isolation, etc. The present work will contemplate the most relevant attempts to clarify the issue of MCI categorization and classification, combining our own data with that from recent studies which suggest the role of relevant psychosocial factors in MCI.

Keywords: classification methods; loneliness; mild cognitive impairment; neuropsychological assessment; social factors; subtypes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Heterogeneity of the cognitive trajectories in cognitively healthy older adults and MCI subjects in a year-year follow-up study. Doctoral Thesis, García-Herranz [39].

References

    1. Petersen R.C., Smith G.E., Waring S.C., Ivnik R.J., Kokmen E., Tangelos E.G. Aging, memory, and mild cognitive impairment. Int. Psychogeriatr. 1997;9:65–69. doi: 10.1017/S1041610297004717. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petersen R.C., Smith G.E., Waring S.C., Ivnik R.J., Tangalos E.G., Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: Clinical characterization and outcome. Arch. Neurol. 1999;56:303–308. doi: 10.1001/archneur.56.3.303. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winblad B., Palmer K., Kivipelto M., Jelic V., Fratiglioni L., Wahlund L., Nordberg A., Bäckman L., Albert M., Almkvist O. Mild cognitive impairment–beyond controversies, towards a consensus: Report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J. Intern. Med. 2004;256:240–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01380.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Panza F., D’introno A., Colacicco A.M., Capurso C., Del Parigi A., Caselli R.J., Pilotto A., Argentieri G., Scapicchio P.L., Scafato E. Current epidemiology of mild cognitive impairment and other predementia syndromes. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 2005;13:633–644. doi: 10.1097/00019442-200508000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petersen R.C., Doody R., Kurz A., Mohs R.C., Morris J.C., Rabins P.V., Ritchie K., Rossor M., Thal L., Winblad B. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch. Neurol. 2001;58:1985–1992. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.12.1985. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources