Speech rate, rate-matching, and intelligibility in early-implanted cochlear implant users
- PMID: 28863583
- PMCID: PMC5566554
- DOI: 10.1121/1.4998590
Speech rate, rate-matching, and intelligibility in early-implanted cochlear implant users
Abstract
An important speech-language outcome for deaf people with cochlear implants is speech intelligibility-how well their speech is understood by others, which also affects social functioning. Beyond simply uttering recognizable words, other speech-language skills may affect communicative competence, including rate-matching or converging toward interlocutors' speech rates. This initial report examines speech rate-matching and its relations to intelligibility in 91 prelingually deaf cochlear implant users and 93 typically hearing peers age 3 to 27 years. Live-voice spoken sentences were repeated and later transcribed by multiple hearing listeners. Speech intelligibility was calculated as proportions of words correctly transcribed. For speech rate-matching measures, speech rates (syllables/s) were normalized as percentages faster or slower than examiners' speech rates. Cochlear implant users had slower speech rates, less accurate and less consistent rate-matching, and poorer speech intelligibility than hearing peers. Among cochlear implant users, speech rate and rate-matching were correlated with intelligibility: faster talkers and better rate-matchers were more intelligible. Rate-matching and intelligibility improved during preschool, with cochlear implant users delayed by about a year compared to hearing peers. By school-age, rate-matching and intelligibility were good overall, but delays persisted for many cochlear implant users. Interventions targeting rate-matching skills are therefore warranted in speech-language therapy for this population.
Figures



References
-
- Apple, W. , Streeter, L. A. , and Krauss, R. M. (1979). “ Effects of pitch and speech rate on personal attributions,” J. Personality Social Psych. 37(5), 715–727.10.1037/0022-3514.37.5.715 - DOI
-
- Babel, M. (2012). “ Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation,” J. Phonetics 40(1), 177–189.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001 - DOI
-
- Benjamini, Y. , and Hochberg, Y. (1995). “ Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing,” J. Royal Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57(1), 289–300.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical