Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Oct 30;23(4):487-494.
doi: 10.5056/jnm17026.

Understanding the Chicago Classification: From Tracings to Patients

Affiliations
Review

Understanding the Chicago Classification: From Tracings to Patients

Francisco Schlottmann et al. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. .

Abstract

Current parameters of the Chicago classification include assessment of the esophageal body (contraction vigour and peristalsis), lower esophageal sphincter relaxation pressure, and intra-bolus pressure pattern. Esophageal disorders include achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, major disorders of peristalsis, and minor disorders of peristalsis. Sub-classification of achalasia in types I, II, and III seems to be useful to predict outcomes and choose the optimal treatment approach. The real clinical significance of other new parameters and disorders is still under investigation.

Keywords: Chicago classification; Esophageal achalasia; Esophageal motility disorders; High-resolution manometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Normal high-resolution manometry plot (left) compared to the same swallow at the conventional manometry (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distal contractile integral (DCI). DCI value is calculated as the product of the mean amplitude of contraction in the distal esophagus (mmHg) times the duration of contraction (seconds) times the length of the distal oesophageal segment (cm) exceeding 20 mmHg for the region spanning from the transition zone to the proximal aspect of the lower esophageal sphincter.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distal latency (DL) measures objectively the time frame of the wave from the beginning of the swallow (upper esophageal relaxation) to the contractile deceleration point (CDP).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) corresponds to the mean pressure of 4 seconds of greatest post deglutitive relaxation in a 10 seconds gap, triggered at the beginning of a swallow. Note diaphragmatic contraction pressure (*) during relaxation excluded from analysis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Achalasia subtypes. Type I: absence of esophageal pressurization; Type II: panesophageal pressurization; Type III: premature contractions (distal latency < 4.5 seconds).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Distal esophageal spasm. Premature contractions (distal latency [DL] < 4.5 seconds) in at least 20% of swallows.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Hypercontractile esophagus (jackhammer esophagus). Distal contractile integral (DCI) > 8000 mmHg·sec·cm in at least 20% of swallows and normal distal latency (DL).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Absent contractility. Aperistalsis in the setting of normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (integrated relaxation pressure < 10 mmHg).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Ineffective esophageal motility. Failed or weak peristalsis in at least ≥ 50% of swallows. DCI, distal contractile integral.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Fragmented peristalsis. ≥ 50% fragmented contractions with distal contractile integral (DCI) > 450 mmHg·sec·cm.

References

    1. Herbella FA, Patti MG. Can high resolution manometry parameters for achalasia be obtained by conventional manometry? World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2015;15:58–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herbella FA, Armijo PR, Patti MG. [A pictorial presentation of 3.0 Chicago classification for esophageal motility disorders]. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2016;14:439–442. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082016MD3444. [English, Portuguese] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography: the Chicago classification. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:627–635. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31815ea291. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:160–174. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roman S, Pandolfino JE, Chen J, Boris L, Luger D, Kahrilas PJ. Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT) Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:37–45. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.313. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources