Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;9(2):67-73.
doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603346. Epub 2017 May 25.

Motor Examination in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Mithun Neral  1   2 , Joseph E Imbriglia  2 , Lois Carlson  3 , Ronit Wollstein  1   4
Affiliations

Motor Examination in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Mithun Neral et al. J Hand Microsurg. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

The relative importance and use of motor evaluation to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is not clear. Because the ulnar nerve is not affected in CTS, we evaluated comparing the strength of the median-nerve innervated muscles to the ulnar innervated muscles in the same patient, through manual muscle testing (MMT) and a handheld dynamometer. Our purpose was to evaluate whether this method, which takes into account patient-dependent factors that would affect both groups of muscles equally, can provide better assessment of CTS. A retrospective case-control review of MMT and dynamometer-measured strength for CTS was performed. The study was performed retrospectively but prior to surgery or other treatment. There were 28 cases (CTS) and 14 controls (without CTS). Positive nerve conduction tests defined cases. MMT of the thenar musculature was found to be unreliable as a test for CTS. Comparisons to ulnar nerve innervated muscle strength did not improve sensitivity or specificity of the MMT examination. Use of the dynamometer improved sensitivity and specificity of motor testing in CTS over MMT. Motor evaluation is important for the diagnosis of CTS, but further study is warranted, specifically to define the method of motor evaluation and delineate the subgroup of patients (predominantly thenar motor presentation) that would benefit most from motor testing and motor-focused treatment.

Keywords: carpal tunnel syndrome; diagnosis; dynamometer; motor examination; ulnar.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the results.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Foresti C, Quadri S, Rasella M, Tironi F, Viscardi M, Ubiali E. Carpal tunnel syndrome: which electrodiagnostic path should we follow? A prospective study of 100 consecutive patients. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;36(06):377–384. - PubMed
    1. Shimizu S, Tachibana S, Fujii K. Difficulty of pinching behind the back: an atypical symptom of carpal tunnel syndrome related to a specific wrist position. Two case reports. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2012;52(04):229–230. - PubMed
    1. Spindler H A, Dellon A L. Nerve conduction studies and sensibility testing in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 1982;7(03):260–263. - PubMed
    1. Sohn M W, Whittle J, Pezzin L E, Miao H, Dillingham T R. Electrodiagnostic consultation and identification of neuromuscular conditions in persons with diabetes. Muscle Nerve. 2011;43(06):812–817. - PubMed
    1. Visser L H, Smidt M H, Lee M L. High-resolution sonography versus EMG in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(01):63–67. - PubMed