Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Sep 5;18(1):384.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1744-5.

Effectiveness of a specific manual approach to the suboccipital region in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain and rotation deficit in the upper cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Vanessa González Rueda  1   2 , Carlos López de Celis  1   2   3 , Martín Eusebio Barra López  4   5 , Andoni Carrasco Uribarren  6 , Sara Castillo Tomás  7 , Cesar Hidalgo García  6
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of a specific manual approach to the suboccipital region in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain and rotation deficit in the upper cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Vanessa González Rueda et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Mechanical neck pain is a highly prevalent problem in primary healthcare settings. Many of these patients have restricted mobility of the cervical spine. Several manual techniques have been recommended for restoring cervical mobility, but their effectiveness in these patients is unknown. The aim of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of two types of specific techniques of the upper neck region: the pressure maintained suboccipital inhibition technique (PMSIT) and the translatory dorsal glide mobilization (TDGM) C0-C1 technique, as adjuncts to a protocolized physiotherapy treatment of the neck region in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain and rotation deficit in the upper cervical spine.

Methods: A randomized, prospective, double-blind (patient and evaluator) clinical trial. The participants (n = 78) will be randomly distributed into three groups. The Control Group will receive a protocolized treatment for 3 weeks, the Mobilization Group will receive the same protocolized treatment and 6 sessions (2 per week) of the TDGM C0-C1 technique, and the Pressure Group will receive the same protocolized treatment and 6 sessions (2 per week) of the PMSIT technique. The intensity of pain (VAS), neck disability (NDI), the cervical range of motion (CROM), headache intensity (HIT-6) and the rating of clinical change (GROC scale) will be measured. The measurements will be performed at baseline, post-treatment and 3 months after the end of treatment, by the same physiotherapist blinded to the group assigned to the subject.

Discussion: We believe that an approach including manual treatment to upper cervical dysfunction will be more effective in these patients. Furthermore, the PMSIT technique acts mostly on the musculature, while the TDGM technique acts on the joint. We expect to clarify which component is more effective in improving the upper cervical mobility.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02832232 . Registered on July 13th, 2016.

Keywords: Atlantoaxial joint; Cervical vertebrae; Range of motion; Suboccipital muscle inhibition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol has been approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee (CREC) of the Jordi Gol Institute of Research in Primary Healthcare (reference number P16/068) on May 25th, 2016 and has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT02832232 on July 13th, 2016. The study will follow the ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects of the Declaration of Helsinki, adopted by the 18th General Assembly of the World Medical Association (World Medical Association, 1964), which were last revised at the association’s 64th General Assembly, in Fortaleza, Brazil, in October 2013. All subjects will provide informed consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Consent was provided for images of the techniques to be included and published.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort Diagram: Flow of the participants throughout the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Suboccipital translatory dorsal glide mobilization (TDGM) C0-C1 technique
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pressure maintained suboccipital inhibition technique (PMSIT)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Buckle PW, Devereux JJ. The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Appl Ergon. 2002;33(3):207–217. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00014-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gross AR, Aker PD, Goldsmith CH, Peloso P. Physical medicine modalities for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000961. - PubMed
    1. Gross AR, Hoving JL, Haines TA, Goldsmith CH, Kay T, Aker P. Movilización activa y pasiva para trastornos mecánicos de cuello. Oxford: En: La Cochrane Library plus en español; 2003.
    1. Fejer R, Ohm-Kyvik K, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(6):834–848. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0864-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Hernández-Barrera V, Alonso-Blanco C, Palacios-Ceña D, Carrasco-Garrido P, Jiménez-Sánchez S, et al. Prevalence of neck and low back pain in community-dwelling adults in Spain: a population-based national study. Spine. 2011;36:E 213–E 219. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d952c2. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data