Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 5:4:170117.
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.117.

Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features

Affiliations

Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features

Spyridon Bakas et al. Sci Data. .

Abstract

Gliomas belong to a group of central nervous system tumors, and consist of various sub-regions. Gold standard labeling of these sub-regions in radiographic imaging is essential for both clinical and computational studies, including radiomic and radiogenomic analyses. Towards this end, we release segmentation labels and radiomic features for all pre-operative multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n=243) of the multi-institutional glioma collections of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), publicly available in The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). Pre-operative scans were identified in both glioblastoma (TCGA-GBM, n=135) and low-grade-glioma (TCGA-LGG, n=108) collections via radiological assessment. The glioma sub-region labels were produced by an automated state-of-the-art method and manually revised by an expert board-certified neuroradiologist. An extensive panel of radiomic features was extracted based on the manually-revised labels. This set of labels and features should enable i) direct utilization of the TCGA/TCIA glioma collections towards repeatable, reproducible and comparative quantitative studies leading to new predictive, prognostic, and diagnostic assessments, as well as ii) performance evaluation of computer-aided segmentation methods, and comparison to our state-of-the-art method.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Single slice multimodal (T1, T1-Gd, T2, T2-FLAIR) MRI scans of example subjects.
Examples are shown (a) in the original TCIA volume; (be) after application of various pre-processing steps; (f) for post-operative volumes in the BraTS ’15 data. Note that the step shown in (e), which is usually used to correct for intensity non-uniformities caused by the inhomogeneity of the scanner’s magnetic field during image acquisition, was not applied in the current data as it obliterated the T2-FLAIR signal.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Single slice multimodal MRI scans of example subjects, illustrating all modalities used in GLISTRboost, and example segmentation labels.
The first three rows depict good segmentation examples, whereas the following three depict bad segmentation examples, produced by GLISTRboost,.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Single slice multimodal MRI scans of example subjects, illustrating all modalities used in GLISTRboost, and examples of the computer-aided (automated) and the manually-revised (manual) segmentation labels.
The type of corrections applied during the manual-revision of the segmentation labels is also shown in the left side of each row; (a) no correction, (b) minor corrections, (c) corrections in the contralateral edema, (d) major (easy) correction of LGG without ET, (e) major (easy) correction of LGG without ET or ED, (f) major (hard) corrections, (g) exceptional subject (TCGA-DU-7304) that could have a meningioma in the midline as the apparent lesion seems to raise from the dura.

Dataset use reported in

  • doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-30858-6_13

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Data Citations

    1. Scarpace L. 2016. The Cancer Imaging Archive. http://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2016.RNYFUYE9 - DOI
    1. Pedano N. 2016. The Cancer Imaging Archive. http://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2016.L4LTD3TK - DOI
    1. Bakas S. 2017. The Cancer Imaging Archive. https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.KLXWJJ1Q - DOI
    1. Bakas S. 2017. The Cancer Imaging Archive. https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.GJQ7R0EF - DOI

References

    1. Kumar V. et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 30, 1234–1248 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambin P. et al. Radiomics: Extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. European Journal of Cancer 48, 441–446 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gillies R. J., Kinahan P. E. & Hricak H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology 278, 563–577 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu L. S. et al. Multi-Parametric MRI and Texture Analysis to Visualize Spatial Histologic Heterogeneity and Tumor Extent in Glioblastoma. PLOS ONE 10, e0141506 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rutman A. M. & Kuo M. D. Radiogenomics: Creating a link between molecular diagnostics and diagnostic imaging. European Journal of Radiology 70, 232–241 (2009). - PubMed

Publication types