Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug;24(4):e290-e315.
doi: 10.3747/co.24.3619. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

Exercise for people with cancer: a systematic review

Affiliations
Review

Exercise for people with cancer: a systematic review

R Segal et al. Curr Oncol. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Background: This systematic review was completed by the Exercise for People with Cancer Guideline Development Group, a group organized by Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc). It provides background and guidance for clinicians with respect to exercise for people living with cancer in active and post treatment. It focuses on the benefits of specific types of exercise, pre-screening requirements for new referrals, safety concerns, and delivery models.

Methods: Using the pebc's standardized approach, medline and embase were systematically searched for existing guidelines, systematic reviews, and primary literature.

Results: The search identified two guidelines, eighteen systematic reviews, and twenty-nine randomized controlled trials with relevance to the topic. The present review provides conclusions about the duration, frequency, and intensity of exercise appropriate for people living with cancer.

Conclusions: The evidence shows that exercise is safe and provides benefit in quality of life and in muscular and aerobic fitness for people with cancer both during and after treatment. The evidence is sufficient to support the promotion of exercise for adults with cancer, and some evidence supports the promotion of exercise in group or supervised settings and for a long period of time to improve quality of life and muscular and aerobic fitness. Exercise at moderate intensities could also be sustainable for longer periods and could encourage exercise to be continued over an individual's lifetime. It is important that a pre-screening assessment be conducted to evaluate the effects of disease, treatments, and comorbidities.

Keywords: Exercise; systematic reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of study selection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Browman GP, Levine MN, Mohide EA, et al. The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:502–12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.2.502. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. on behalf of the agree Next Steps Consortium agree ii: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. CMAJ. 2010;182:E839–42. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090449. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. amstar is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1013–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. London, U.K.: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Ver. 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] [Available online at: http://handbook.cochrane.org/; cited 24 May 2015]
    1. Holdt HK, Desomer A, Hanssens S, Vlayen J. Supportive Treatment for Cancer. Part 1: Exercise Treatment. Brussels, Belgium: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; 2012.

LinkOut - more resources