Clinical impact of confocal laser endomicroscopy in the management of gastrointestinal lesions with an uncertain diagnosis
- PMID: 28874959
- PMCID: PMC5565504
- DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i8.389
Clinical impact of confocal laser endomicroscopy in the management of gastrointestinal lesions with an uncertain diagnosis
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the clinical impact of confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) in the diagnosis and management of patients with an uncertain diagnosis.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed. Patients who underwent CLE between November 2013 and October 2015 and exhibited a poor correlation between endoscopic and histological findings were included. Baseline characteristics, indications, previous diagnostic studies, findings at the time of CLE, clinical management and histological results were analyzed. Interventions based on CLE findings were also analyzed. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of CLE and target biopsies of surgical specimens.
Results: A total of 144 patients were included. Of these, 51% (74/144) were female. The mean age was 51 years old. In all, 41/144 (28.4%) lesions were neoplastic (13 bile duct, 10 gastric, 8 esophageal, 6 colonic, 1 duodenal, 1 rectal, 1 ampulloma and 1 pancreatic). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and observed agreement when CLE was used to detect N-lesions were 85.37%, 87.38%, 72.92%, 93.75% and 86.81%, respectively. Cohen's Kappa was 69.20%, thus indicating good agreement. Changes in management were observed in 54% of the cases.
Conclusion: CLE is a new diagnostic tool that has a significant clinical impact on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with uncertain diagnosis.
Keywords: Barret esophagus; Biliary strictures; Confocal laser endomicroscopy; Gastrointestinal cancer; In vivo microscopy; Pancreatic cyst.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Confocal laser endomicroscopy in diagnosing indeterminate biliary strictures and pancreatic lesions a prospective pilot study.Rozhl Chir. 2020 Spring;99(6):258-265. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2020.99.6.258-265. Rozhl Chir. 2020. PMID: 32736480 English.
-
Detection of superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia by chromoendoscopy-guided confocal laser endomicroscopy.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 14;21(22):6974-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6974. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26078575 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Correlation Between Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (Cellvizio®) and Histological Grading of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Step Forward for a Better Selection of Patients Suitable for Conservative Management.Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):954-959. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jun 4. Eur Urol Focus. 2018. PMID: 28753800
-
Confocal laser endomicroscopy in the diagnostics of gastrointestinal lesions literary review and personal experience.Rozhl Chir. 2018 Winter;97(12):531-538. Rozhl Chir. 2018. PMID: 30646731 Review. English.
-
The Use of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 2;12(7):1616. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071616. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35885521 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Confocal laser endomicroscopy detects colonic inflammation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a prospective study.Endosc Int Open. 2020 Apr;8(4):E550-E557. doi: 10.1055/a-1119-6327. Epub 2020 Mar 23. Endosc Int Open. 2020. PMID: 32258379 Free PMC article.
-
Confocal endomicroscopy: Is it time to move on?World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan 10;8(1):1-3. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i1.1. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26788257 Free PMC article.
-
Newly proposed quantitative criteria can assess chronic atrophic gastritis via probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE): a pilot study.Endosc Int Open. 2022 Apr 14;10(4):E297-E306. doi: 10.1055/a-1662-5150. eCollection 2022 Apr. Endosc Int Open. 2022. PMID: 35433202 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bartels F, Hahn HJ, Stolte M, Schmidt-Wilcke HA. [Quality of diagnostic procedures and frequency of endoscopically defined diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract] Z Gastroenterol. 2003;41:311–318. - PubMed
-
- Isaacs KL. Upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002;12:451–462, vii. - PubMed
-
- Sharma P, Hawes RH, Bansal A, Gupta N, Curvers W, Rastogi A, Singh M, Hall M, Mathur SC, Wani SB, et al. Standard endoscopy with random biopsies versus narrow band imaging targeted biopsies in Barrett’s oesophagus: a prospective, international, randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2013;62:15–21. - PubMed
-
- Calhoun BC, Gomes F, Robert ME, Jain D. Sampling error in the standard evaluation of endoscopic colonic biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:254–257. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources