Validation of the Iranian Version of the ECOS-16 Questionnaire in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
- PMID: 28874977
- PMCID: PMC5573853
- DOI: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.4.586
Validation of the Iranian Version of the ECOS-16 Questionnaire in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
Abstract
Study design: Prospective clinical study.
Purpose: To translate and validate the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (ECOS-16) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in Iran.
Overview of literature: It is important to assess the psychometric properties of instruments measuring patient-reported outcomes.
Methods: The translation was performed using the backward-forward translation method. The final version was generated by consensus among the translators. Every woman who had a T-score of <-2.5 completed ECOS-16. Patients were divided into two study groups according to the World Health Organization's criteria: those with at least one vertebral fracture (surgery group) and those with no fractures (control group). They were asked to respond to the questionnaire at three points in time: preoperative and twice within 1-week interval after surgery assessments (6-month follow-up). The 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) also was completed. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire were assessed using internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and responsiveness.
Results: Of 137 recruited women, 39 underwent surgery and 98 did not. Analysis of the ECOS-16 scales showed an appropriate reliability with Cronbach's alpha of >0.70 for all scales. Test-retest reliability as indicated by intraclass correlation coefficient was found to be 0.85 (0.68-0.91). Additionally, the correlation of each item with its hypothesized domain of the ECOS-16 showed acceptable results, suggesting that the items had a substantial relationship with their own domains. Further analysis also indicated that the questionnaire was responsive to change (effect size, 0.85; standardized response mean, 0.93) (p<0.001). Significant correlations existed between scores of similar subscales of ECOS-16 and SF-36 (p<0.001).
Conclusions: ECOS-16 is an acceptable, reliable, valid, and responsive measure to assess the quality of life in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
Keywords: ECOS-16; Iran; Osteoporosis; Validity.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
References
-
- de Oliveira Ferreira N, da Silva RB, Arthuso M, Pinto-Neto AM, Caserta N, Costa-Paiva L. Prevalence of vertebral fractures and quality of life in a sample of postmenopausal Brazilian women with osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos. 2012;7:101–106. - PubMed
-
- Wade SW, Strader C, Fitzpatrick LA, Anthony MS. Sex- and age-specific incidence of non-traumatic fractures in selected industrialized countries. Arch Osteoporos. 2012;7:219–227. - PubMed
-
- Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, et al. Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10:150–160. - PubMed
-
- Azimi P, Shahzadi S, Azhari S, Montazeri A. An outcome measure of functionality and quality of life in Iranian women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a validation study of the QUALEFFO-41. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19:860–867. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
