Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug 23:8:497.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00497. eCollection 2017.

Adaptive Pathways: Possible Next Steps for Payers in Preparation for Their Potential Implementation

Affiliations
Review

Adaptive Pathways: Possible Next Steps for Payers in Preparation for Their Potential Implementation

Patricia Vella Bonanno et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Medicines receiving a conditional marketing authorization through Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs) will be a challenge for payers. The "introduction" of MAPPs is already seen by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as a fait accompli, with payers not consulted or involved. However, once medicines are approved through MAPPs, they will be evaluated for funding by payers through different activities. These include Health Technology Assessment (HTA) with often immature clinical data and high uncertainty, financial considerations, and negotiations through different types of agreements, which can require monitoring post launch. Payers have experience with new medicines approved through conditional approval, and the fact that MAPPs present additional challenges is a concern from their perspective. There may be some activities where payers can collaborate. The final decisions on whether to reimburse a new medicine via MAPPs will have more variation than for medicines licensed via conventional processes. This is due not only to increasing uncertainty associated with medicines authorized through MAPPs but also differences in legal frameworks between member states. Moreover, if the financial and side-effect burden from the period of conditional approval until granting full marketing authorization is shifted to the post-authorization phase, payers may have to bear such burdens. Collection of robust data during routine clinical use is challenging along with high prices for new medicines during data collection. This paper presents the concept of MAPPs and possible challenges. Concerns and potential ways forward are discussed and a number of recommendations are presented from the perspective of payers.

Keywords: Adaptive Pathways; European Medicines Agency; Health Technology Assessment; marketing authorization; payers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Suggested model to better manage the introduction of new medicines (reproduced with the permission of Frontiers in Pharmacology; Malmstrom et al., 2013).

References

    1. Adamski J., Godman B., Ofierska-Sujkowska G., Osinska B., Herholz H., Wendykowska K., et al. (2010). Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers. BMC Health Serv. Res. 10:153 10.1186/1472-6963-10-153 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aggarwal A., Fojo T., Chamberlain C., Davis C., Sullivan R. (2017) Do patient access schemes for high-cost cancer drugs deliver value to society? -lessons from the NHS Cancer Drugs Fund. Ann. Oncol. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1093/annonc/mdx110 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ANSM (2015). Notice to Applicants for Marketing for Temporary Authorisation for Use (ATU). Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé (ANSM). Available online at: http://ansm.sante.fr/var/ansm_site/storage/original/application/cadfbcf9...
    1. Aronson J. K., Ferner R. E., Hughes D. A. (2012). Defining rewardable innovation in drug therapy. Nat. Rev. 11, 253–254. 10.1038/nrd3715 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avorn J. (2015). The $2.6 billion pill – methodologic and policy considerations. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 1877–1879. 10.1056/NEJMp1500848 - DOI - PubMed