Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 22:8:432.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00432. eCollection 2017.

Speech and Voice Response to a Levodopa Challenge in Late-Stage Parkinson's Disease

Affiliations

Speech and Voice Response to a Levodopa Challenge in Late-Stage Parkinson's Disease

Margherita Fabbri et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) patients are affected by hypokinetic dysarthria, characterized by hypophonia and dysprosody, which worsens with disease progression. Levodopa's (l-dopa) effect on quality of speech is inconclusive; no data are currently available for late-stage PD (LSPD).

Objective: To assess the modifications of speech and voice in LSPD following an acute l-dopa challenge.

Method: LSPD patients [Schwab and England score <50/Hoehn and Yahr stage >3 (MED ON)] performed several vocal tasks before and after an acute l-dopa challenge. The following was assessed: respiratory support for speech, voice quality, stability and variability, speech rate, and motor performance (MDS-UPDRS-III). All voice samples were recorded and analyzed by a speech and language therapist blinded to patients' therapeutic condition using Praat 5.1 software.

Results: 24/27 (14 men) LSPD patients succeeded in performing voice tasks. Median age and disease duration of patients were 79 [IQR: 71.5-81.7] and 14.5 [IQR: 11-15.7] years, respectively. In MED OFF, respiratory breath support and pitch break time of LSPD patients were worse than the normative values of non-parkinsonian. A correlation was found between disease duration and voice quality (R = 0.51; p = 0.013) and speech rate (R = -0.55; p = 0.008). l-Dopa significantly improved MDS-UPDRS-III score (20%), with no effect on speech as assessed by clinical rating scales and automated analysis.

Conclusion: Speech is severely affected in LSPD. Although l-dopa had some effect on motor performance, including axial signs, speech and voice did not improve. The applicability and efficacy of non-pharmacological treatment for speech impairment should be considered for speech disorder management in PD.

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; late stage; levodopa; speech; voice.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Holmes RJ, Oates JM, Phyland DJ, Hughes AJ. Voice characteristics in the progression of Parkinson’s disease. Int J Lang Commun Disord (2000) 35(3):407–18.10.1080/136828200410654 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perez-Lloret S, Negre-Pages L, Ojero-Senard A, Damier P, Destee A, Tison F, et al. Oro-buccal symptoms (dysphagia, dysarthria, and sialorrhea) in patients with Parkinson’s disease: preliminary analysis from the French COPARK cohort. Eur J Neurol (2012) 19(1):28–37.10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03402.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pawlukowska W, Golab-Janowska M, Safranow K, Rotter I, Amernik K, Honczarenko K, et al. Articulation disorders and duration, severity and L-dopa dosage in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Neurochir Pol (2015) 49(5):302–6.10.1016/j.pjnns.2015.07.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ho AK, Iansek R, Marigliani C, Bradshaw JL, Gates S. Speech impairment in a large sample of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Behav Neurol (1998) 11(3):131–7.10.1155/1999/327643 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller N, Noble E, Jones D, Burn D. Life with communication changes in Parkinson’s disease. Age Ageing (2006) 35(3):235–9.10.1093/ageing/afj053 - DOI - PubMed