Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 19;5(1):e000415.
doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000415. eCollection 2017.

Insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant obese and non-obese phenotypes: role in prediction of incident pre-diabetes in a longitudinal biracial cohort

Affiliations

Insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant obese and non-obese phenotypes: role in prediction of incident pre-diabetes in a longitudinal biracial cohort

Ibiye Owei et al. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. .

Abstract

Objective: We measured insulin sensitivity with euglycemic clamp (Si-clamp) in initially normoglycemic African Americans (AA) and European Americans (EA), to probe the existence of subphenotypes of obesity and leanness, and their impact on incident dysglycemia during longitudinal follow-up.

Research design and methods: 320 healthy subjects (176 AA, 144 EA; mean age 44.2±10.6 years) underwent baseline assessments, including Si-clamp and homeostasis model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and were stratified into: insulin-resistant obese (IRO) (body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2, Si-clamp <0.1, HOMA-IR >2.5); insulin-sensitive obesity (ISO) (BMI >30 kg/m2, Si-clamp >0.1, HOMA-IR <2.5); insulin-resistant non-obese (IRN) (BMI <28 kg/m2, Si-clamp <0.1, HOMA-IR >2.5); insulin-sensitive non-obese (ISN) (BMI <28 kg/m2, Si-clamp >0.1, HOMA-IR <2.5). Outcome measures were cardiometabolic risks and incident pre-diabetes/type 2 diabetes (T2D) during 5.5 years.

Results: Compared with IRO, subjects with ISO had lower abdominal fat, triglycerides and high-sensitivity C reactive protein and higher adiponectin (p=0.015 to <0.0001). IRN subjects had higher cardiometabolic risk markers than ISN (p=0.03 to <0.0001). During 5.5-year follow-up, incident pre-diabetes/T2D was lower in ISO (31.3% vs 48.7%) among obese subjects and higher in IRN (47.1% vs. 26.0%) among non-obese subjects (p=0.0024). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly different pre-diabetes/T2D survival probabilities across insulin sensitivity/adiposity phenotypes (p=0.0001).

Conclusions: Insulin sensitivity predicts ~40% decrease in the relative risk of incident pre-diabetes/T2D among obese persons, whereas insulin resistance predicts ~80% increased risk among non-obese persons. This is the first documentation of healthy and unhealthy phenotypes of obesity and leanness in a prospective biracial cohort, using rigorous measurement of insulin sensitivity.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease risk; ethnic comparisons; obesity metabolism; pre-diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Upper panel: Regression plots of insulin sensitivity (Si-clamp) (A) and homeostasis model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (B) versus body mass index, and Si-clamp versus HOMA-IR (C), in African Americans (closed circles) and European Americans (open circles). Lower panel: Percentile distribution of Si-clamp (D) and HOMA-IR (E) in the study cohort. HOMA-IR data were obtained in 320 subjects, of whom 206 underwent hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp to generate Si-clamp data.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Insulin sensitivity (Si-clamp) in obese and non-obese study subjects (A) and cumulative incidence of pre-diabetes/type 2 diabetes in insulin-resistant obese (IRO), insulin-sensitive obese (ISO), insulin-resistant non-obese (IRN) and insulin-sensitive non-obese (ISN) subjects (B). The cumulative incidence was 48.7% in IRO, 30.9% in ISO, 47.1% in IRN and 26% in ISN groups, respectively (χ2 P for trend=0.0024). (C) Kaplan-Meier plot of pre-diabetes/type 2 diabetes survival among participants stratified by IRO, IRN, ISO or ISN status (log-rank sum p=0.0001).

References

    1. Ferrannini E, Natali A, Bell P, et al. . Insulin resistance and hypersecretion in obesity. European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR). J Clin Invest 1997;100:1166–73.10.1172/JCI119628 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brochu M, Tchernof A, Dionne IJ, et al. . What are the physical characteristics associated with a normal metabolic profile despite a high level of obesity in postmenopausal women? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:1020–5.10.1210/jcem.86.3.7365 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stefan N, Kantartzis K, Machann J, et al. . Identification and characterization of metabolically benign obesity in humans. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:1609–16.10.1001/archinte.168.15.1609 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pajunen P, Kotronen A, Korpi-Hyövälti E, et al. . Metabolically healthy and unhealthy obesity phenotypes in the general population: the FIN-D2D Survey. BMC Public Health 2011;11:75410.1186/1471-2458-11-754 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blüher M. The distinction of metabolically 'healthy' from 'unhealthy' obese individuals. Curr Opin Lipidol 2010;21:38–43.10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283346ccc - DOI - PubMed