Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug 23:7:190.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00190. eCollection 2017.

The Oncopig Cancer Model: An Innovative Large Animal Translational Oncology Platform

Affiliations
Review

The Oncopig Cancer Model: An Innovative Large Animal Translational Oncology Platform

Kyle M Schachtschneider et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Despite an improved understanding of cancer molecular biology, immune landscapes, and advancements in cytotoxic, biologic, and immunologic anti-cancer therapeutics, cancer remains a leading cause of death worldwide. More than 8.2 million deaths were attributed to cancer in 2012, and it is anticipated that cancer incidence will continue to rise, with 19.3 million cases expected by 2025. The development and investigation of new diagnostic modalities and innovative therapeutic tools is critical for reducing the global cancer burden. Toward this end, transitional animal models serve a crucial role in bridging the gap between fundamental diagnostic and therapeutic discoveries and human clinical trials. Such animal models offer insights into all aspects of the basic science-clinical translational cancer research continuum (screening, detection, oncogenesis, tumor biology, immunogenicity, therapeutics, and outcomes). To date, however, cancer research progress has been markedly hampered by lack of a genotypically, anatomically, and physiologically relevant large animal model. Without progressive cancer models, discoveries are hindered and cures are improbable. Herein, we describe a transgenic porcine model-the Oncopig Cancer Model (OCM)-as a next-generation large animal platform for the study of hematologic and solid tumor oncology. With mutations in key tumor suppressor and oncogenes, TP53R167H and KRASG12D , the OCM recapitulates transcriptional hallmarks of human disease while also exhibiting clinically relevant histologic and genotypic tumor phenotypes. Moreover, as obesity rates increase across the global population, cancer patients commonly present clinically with multiple comorbid conditions. Due to the effects of these comorbidities on patient management, therapeutic strategies, and clinical outcomes, an ideal animal model should develop cancer on the background of representative comorbid conditions (tumor macro- and microenvironments). As observed in clinical practice, liver cirrhosis frequently precedes development of primary liver cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma. The OCM has the capacity to develop tumors in combination with such relevant comorbidities. Furthermore, studies on the tumor microenvironment demonstrate similarities between OCM and human cancer genomic landscapes. This review highlights the potential of this and other large animal platforms as transitional models to bridge the gap between basic research and clinical practice.

Keywords: cancer models; clinical needs; oncology; oncopig; pigs; translational medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Development and utilization of the Oncopig Cancer Model (OCM). (A) Diagram of the Oncopig transgene cassette located on chromosome 18. A Lox-Stop-Lox sequence prevents expression of KRASG12D and TP53R167H. Exposure to Cre recombinase results in site specific recombination between the two recognition sites (LoxP), resulting in removal of the Stop sequence and subsequent expression of KRASG12D and TP53R167H. (B) Diagram of the breeding scheme used to produce Oncopigs for experimental use. The original male Oncopig homozygous for an MHC haplotype and carrying a single transgene cassette located on chromosome 18 is bred to a non-transgenic female to produce offspring heterozygous for the transgene cassette and MHC haplotype. The resulting heterozygous offspring are further bred to produce Oncopig offspring homozygous for both the transgene cassette and an MHC haplotype. Male homozygous offspring can then be bred to a variety of transgenic or non-transgenic pig breeds (depicted through varying color) to produce genetically diverse Oncopigs for experimental purposes, all of which harbor a single copy of the transgene cassette and a shared MHC haplotype.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Utilization of the Oncopig Cancer Model (OCM) for biomarker discovery and validation. (A) Tumor and blood samples are taken from Oncopigs for biomarker screening studies. Samples are processed immediately (fresh), flash-frozen, or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE). Blood samples can immediately undergo Ficoll density centrifugation for isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Fresh tumor samples can be used to produce tumor cell lines and isolate tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). The flash-frozen samples can be used for deep sequencing (i.e., whole-exome sequencing, RNA-seq, miRNA-seq, and DNA methylation analysis). FFPE samples can be utilized for immunohistochemistry (IHC) of the tumor and the tumor microenvironment. Results obtained from these analyses can be correlated with patient outcomes to identify predictive biomarkers. (B) Proposed testing of clinical management with immunotherapy. As new immunotherapy agents and combinations are developed, optimal combinations and subtype susceptibility must be determined. Patients experiencing durable responses that are sustained even off treatment require new concepts in risk management and mitigation, while making the most of the clinical benefit. Overall, a phased approach can be tested in which aggressive combination regimens that achieve frequent responses can be followed by maintenance with less aggressive and safer regimens, reaching the point of weaning responsive animals off treatment. Identifying biomarkers will be crucial for optimal clinical management. Adapted from Ref. (122).

References

    1. Aravalli RN, Golzarian J, Cressman ENK. Animal models of cancer in interventional radiology. Eur Radiol (2009) 19:1049–53. 10.1007/s00330-008-1263-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheon D-J, Orsulic S. Mouse models of cancer. Annu Rev Pathol (2011) 6:95–119. 10.1146/annurev.pathol.3.121806.154244 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frese KK, Tuveson DA. Maximizing mouse cancer models. Nat Rev Cancer (2007) 7:654–8. 10.1038/nrc2192 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rivina L, Schiestl R. Mouse models of radiation-induced cancers. Adv Genet (2013) 84:83–122. 10.1016/B978-0-12-407703-4.00003-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu Y, Yin T, Feng Y, Cona MM, Huang G, Liu J, et al. Mammalian models of chemically induced primary malignancies exploitable for imaging-based preclinical theragnostic research. Quant Imaging Med Surg (2015) 5:708–29. 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2015.06.01 - DOI - PMC - PubMed