Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;72(6):517-530.
doi: 10.1037/amp0000103.

Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States

Affiliations

Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States

Julianne Holt-Lunstad et al. Am Psychol. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

A robust body of scientific evidence has indicated that being embedded in high-quality close relationships and feeling socially connected to the people in one's life is associated with decreased risk for all-cause mortality as well as a range of disease morbidities. Despite mounting evidence that the magnitude of these associations is comparable to that of many leading health determinants (that receive significant public health resources), government agencies, health care providers and associations, and public or private health care funders have been slow to recognize human social relationships as either a health determinant or health risk marker in a manner that is comparable to that of other public health priorities. This article evaluates current evidence (on social relationships and health) according to criteria commonly used in determining public health priorities. The article discusses challenges for reducing risk in this area and outlines an agenda for integrating social relationships into current public health priorities. (PsycINFO Database Record

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Benchmarking social connection with leading health indicators on (A) decreased odds for mortality; and (B) prevalence in the population.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A) The state of relationships and health science embedded in a social ecological model. Text boxes are positioned in their respective levels of analysis (individual, relationship, organization/community, society/policy) and some boxes span multiple levels (i.e., individual and relationship). B) Recommendations for researchers, government agencies, health care providers and associations, and public/private health care funders to integrate social relationships into current public health priorities.

References

    1. Anderson LM, Shinn C, Fullilove MT, Scrimshaw SC, Fielding JE, Normand J … Task Force on Community Preventive Services. The effectiveness of early childhood development programs - A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003;24(3):32–46. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00655-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arving C, Brandberg Y, Feldman I, Johansson B, Glimelius B. Cost-utility analysis of individual psychosocial support interventions for breast cancer patients in a randomized controlled study. Psycho-Oncology. 2014;23(3):251–258. doi: 10.1002/pon.3411. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Authors/Task Force Members. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, … Verschuren WMM. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR) European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2016;23:NP1–NP96. doi: 10.1177/2047487316653709. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barilla D, Marshak HH, Anderson SE, Hopp JW. Can psychosocial support reduce newborn admissions? MCN: The American Journal Of Maternal/Child Nursing. 2010;35(1):33–39. doi: 10.1097/01.NMC.0000366808.75079.c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJF, Martin BW. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? The Lancet. 2012;380(9838):258–271. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1. - DOI - PubMed