Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Sep 7;9(9):CD004479.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004479.pub3.

Simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults

Kristin V Carson-Chahhoud  1 , Abel Wakai, Joseph Em van Agteren, Brian J Smith, Grainne McCabe, Malcolm P Brinn, Ronan O'Sullivan
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults

Kristin V Carson-Chahhoud et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: For management of pneumothorax that occurs without underlying lung disease, also referred to as primary spontaneous pneumothorax, simple aspiration is technically easier to perform than intercostal tube drainage. In this systematic review, we seek to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. This review was first published in 2007 and was updated in 2017.

Objectives: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 1) in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (1966 to January 2017); and Embase (1980 to January 2017). We searched the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry for ongoing trials (January 2017). We checked the reference lists of included trials and contacted trial authors. We imposed no language restrictions.

Selection criteria: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adults 18 years of age and older with primary spontaneous pneumothorax that compared simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. We combined studies using the random-effects model.

Main results: Of 2332 publications obtained through the search strategy, seven studies met the inclusion criteria; one study was ongoing and six studies of 435 participants were eligible for inclusion in the updated review. Data show a significant difference in immediate success rates of procedures favouring tube drainage over simple aspiration for management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (risk ratio (RR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69 to 0.89; 435 participants, 6 studies; moderate-quality evidence). Duration of hospitalization however was significantly less for patients treated by simple aspiration (mean difference (MD) -1.66, 95% CI -2.28 to -1.04; 387 participants, 5 studies; moderate-quality evidence). A narrative synthesis of evidence revealed that simple aspiration led to fewer adverse events (245 participants, 3 studies; low-quality evidence), but data suggest no differences between groups in terms of one-year success rate (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.18; 318 participants, 4 studies; moderate-quality evidence), hospitalization rate (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.47; 245 participants, 3 studies; very low-quality evidence), and patient satisfaction (median between-group difference of 0.5 on a scale from 1 to 10; 48 participants, 1 study; low-quality evidence). No studies provided data on cost-effectiveness.

Authors' conclusions: Available trials showed low to moderate-quality evidence that intercostal tube drainage produced higher rates of immediate success, while simple aspiration resulted in a shorter duration of hospitalization. Although adverse events were reported more commonly for patients treated with tube drainage, the low quality of the evidence warrants caution in interpreting these findings. Similarly, although this review observed no differences between groups when early failure rate, one-year success rate, or hospital admission rate was evaluated, this too needs to be put into the perspective of the quality of evidence, specifically, for evidence of very low and low quality for hospitalization rate and patient satisfaction, respectively. Future adequately powered research is needed to strengthen the evidence presented in this review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Kristin Carson‐Chahhoud: no conflicts of interest to declare.

Abel Wakai: no conflicts of interest to declare.

Joseph van Agteren: no conflicts of interest to declare.

Brian Smith: no conflicts of interest to declare.

Grainne McCabe: no conflicts of interest to declare.

Malcolm Brinn: no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ronan O'Sullivan: no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage, outcome: 1.1 Immediate success rate of procedure as defined by study authors.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Andrivet 1995 {published data only}
    1. Andrivet P, Djedaini K, Teboul JL, Brochard L, Dreyfuss D. Spontaneous pneumothorax. Comparison of thoracic drainage vs immediate or delayed needle aspiration. Chest 1995;108:335‐9. [PUBMED: 7634863] - PubMed
Ayed 2006 {published data only}
    1. Ayed AK, Chandrasekaran C, Sukumar M. Aspiration versus tube drainage in primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomised study. European Respiratory Journal 2006;27:477‐82. [DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00091505; PUBMED: 16507846] - DOI - PubMed
Harvey 1994 {published data only}
    1. Harvey J, Prescott RJ. Simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for spontaneous pneumothorax in patients with normal lungs. British Thoracic Society Research Committee. BMJ 1994;309:1338‐9. [PUBMED: 7755720] - PMC - PubMed
Ho 2011 {published data only}
    1. Ho KK, Ong MEH, Koh MS, Wong E, Raghuram J. A randomized controlled trial comparing minichest tube and needle aspiration in outpatient management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2011;29:1152‐7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.05.017; PUBMED: 20716475 ] - DOI - PubMed
Noppen 2002 {published data only}
    1. Noppen M, Alexander P, Driesen P, Slabbynck H, Verstraeten A. Manual aspiration versus chest tube drainage in first episodes of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a multicenter, prospective, randomized pilot study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2002;165:1240‐4. [DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200111-078OC; PUBMED: 11991872 ] - DOI - PubMed
Parlak 2012 {published data only}
    1. Parlak M, Uil SM, Berg JWK. A prospective, randomised trial of pneumothorax therapy: manual aspiration versus conventional chest tube drainage. Respiratory Medicine 2012;106:1600‐5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.08.005; PUBMED: 22925840 ] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg JWK, Klinieken I. Pneumothorax therapy: manual aspiration versus conventional chest tube drainage (pneumothorax). Clinicaltrials.gov (accessed 9 November 2007). [NCT00556335]

References to studies excluded from this review

Burgaud 1985 {published data only}
    1. Burgaud JC, Offenstadt G, Bencharif G, Hericord P, Amstutz P. Spontaneous pneumothorax: drainage by catheter or chest tube?. Revue de Pneumologie Clinique 1985;41:317‐9. [PUBMED: 4095427] - PubMed
Faruqi 2004 {published data only}
    1. Faruqi S, Gupta D, Aggarwal AN, Jindal SK. Role of simple needle aspiration in the management of pneumothorax. The Indian Journal of Chest Diseases and Allied Sciences 2004;46:183‐90. [PUBMED: 15553207] - PubMed
Hernandez Ortiz 1999 {published data only}
    1. Hernandez OC, Zugasti GK, Emparanza KJ, Boyero UA, Ventura HI, Isaba SL, et al. Idiopathic spontaneous pneumothorax: treatment by small‐caliber catheter aspiration compared to drainage through a chest tube. Archivos de Bronchoneumologia 1999;35:179‐81. [PUBMED: 10330539] - PubMed
Korczynski 2015 {published data only}
    1. Korczynski P, Gorska K, Nasilowski J, Chazan R, Krenke R. Comparison of small bore catheter aspiration and chest tube drainage in the management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2015;866:15‐23. [PUBMED: 26022901] - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

Desmettre 2011 {published data only}
    1. Desmettre T. Comparison of exsufflation versus drainage in primary spontaneous pneumothorax (EXPRED). Clinicaltrials.gov (accessed 9 September 2009). [NCT01008228]
    1. Desmettre T, Meurice J‐C, Woronoff M‐C, Tiffet O, Ferretti G, Dalphin J‐C. EXPRED study: aspiration versus drainage of a first pneumothorax; comparison of simple aspiration versus standard drainage in the treatment of large primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Revue des Maladies Respiratoires 2011;28(3):336‐43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2010.10.030] - DOI - PubMed
    1. Desmettre T, Meurice JC, Tapponnier R, Pretalli JB, Dalphin JC. The EXPRED study: where are we? [Étude EXPRED (EXsufflation d’un PREmier pneumothorax versus Drainage): où en sommes‐nous?]. Revue des Maladies Respiratoires 2015;30(1):18‐21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2012.09.019] - DOI - PubMed

Additional references

Aguinagalde 2010
    1. Aguinagalde B, Zabaleta J, Fuentes M, Bazterargui N, Hernandez C, Izquierdo JM, et al. Percutaneous aspiration versus tube drainage for spontaneous pneumothorax: systematic review and meta‐analysis. European Journal of Cardio‐thoracic Surgery 2010;37(5):1129‐35. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.12.008; PUBMED: 20060735 ] - DOI - PubMed
Baumann 1997
    1. Baumann MH, Strange C. Treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: a more aggressive approach?. Chest 1997;112:789‐804. [PUBMED: 9315817] - PubMed
Baumann 2001
    1. Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, Light R, Kirby TJ, Klein J, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: an American College of Chest Physicians Delphi consensus statement. Chest 2001;119:590‐602. [PUBMED: 11171742] - PubMed
Bense 1987
    1. Bense L, Wiman LG, Hedenstierna G. Onset of symptoms in spontaneous pneumothorax: correlations to physical activity. European Journal of Respiratory Diseases 1987;71:181‐6. [PUBMED: 3678419] - PubMed
Bense 1991
    1. Bense L, Wiman LG, Jendteg S, Lindgren B. Economic costs of spontaneous pneumothorax. Chest 1991;99:260‐1. [PUBMED: 1984974] - PubMed
Bintcliffe 2015
    1. Bintcliffe OJ, Hallifax RJ, Edey A, Feller‐Kopman D, Lee YCG, Marquette CH, et al. Spontaneous pneumothorax: time to rethink management?. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2015;3(7):578‐88. [PUBMED: 26170077] - PubMed
BMJ 2016
    1. BMJ Best Practice. Pneumothorax. http://bestpractice.bmj.com/best‐practice/monograph/504/treatment/step‐b... 2016 (accessed February 2016).
Camuset 2006
    1. Camuset J, Laganier J, Brugière O, Dauriat G, Jebrak G, Thabut G, et al. Needle aspiration as first‐line management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. La Presse Médicale 2006;35(5):765‐8. [PUBMED: 16710143] - PubMed
Chan 1997
    1. Chan L, Reilly KM, Henderson C, Khan F, Salluzzo RF. Complication rates of tube thoracostomy. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 1997;15:368‐70. [PUBMED: 9217527] - PubMed
Cook 2015
    1. Cook JA, Elders A, Boachie C, Bassinga T, Fraser C, Altman DG, et al. A systematic review of the use of an expertise‐based randomised controlled trial design. Trials 2015;16(1):241. [PUBMED: 26025450 ] - PMC - PubMed
Currie 2007
    1. Currie GP, Alluri R, Christie GL, Legge JS. Pneumothorax: an update. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2007;83(981):461‐5. [PUBMED: 17621614 ] - PMC - PubMed
Daly 1985
    1. Daly RC, Mucha P, Pairolero PC, Farnell MB. The risk of percutaneous chest tube thoracostomy for blunt thoracic trauma. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1985;14:865‐70. [PUBMED: 4025984] - PubMed
Davies 2008
    1. Davies HE, Merchant S, McGown A. A study of the complications of small bore 'Seldinger' intercostal chest drains. Respirology 2008;13(4):603‐7. [PUBMED: 18422864] - PubMed
Devanand 2004
    1. Devanand A, Koh MS, Ong TH, Low SY, Phua GC, Tan KL, et al. Simple aspiration versus chest‐tube insertion in the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a systematic review. Respiratory Medicine 2004;98(7):579‐90. [PUBMED: 15250222] - PubMed
Grundy 2012
    1. Grundy S, Bentley A, Tschopp J. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a diffuse disease of the pleura. Respiration 2012;83(3):185‐9. [PUBMED: 22343477 ] - PubMed
Gupta 2000
    1. Gupta D, Hansell A, Nichols T, Duong T, Ayers JG, Strachan D. Epidemiology of pneumothorax in England. Thorax 2000;55:666‐71. [PUBMED: 10899243] - PMC - PubMed
Gurley 1998
    1. Gurley MB, Richli WR, Waugh KA. Outpatient management of pneumothorax after fine‐needle aspiration: economic advantages for the hospital and patient. Radiology 1998;209(3):717‐22. [PUBMED: 9844664] - PubMed
Guyatt 2008
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck‐Ytter Y, Alonso‐Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (Clinical research edition) 2008;336:924‐6. [PUBMED: 18436948] - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. In: Higgins JP, Green S editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. handbook.cochrane.org.
Holden 1982
    1. Holden MP. Management of Intercostal Drainage Tubes. Bristol: John Wright, 1982.
Iberti 1992
    1. Iberti TJ, Stern PM. Chest tube thoracostomy. Critical Care Clinics 1992;14:879‐95. [PUBMED: 1393756] - PubMed
Janssen 1994
    1. Janssen JP, Cuesta MA, Postmus PE. Treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: survey among Dutch pneumonologists. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1994;138:661‐4. [PUBMED: 8152496] - PubMed
Kelly 2008
    1. Kelly A‐M, Kerr D, Clooney M. Outcomes of emergency department patients treated for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Chest 2008;134(5):1033‐6. [PUBMED: 18583511 ] - PubMed
Khan 1996
    1. Khan KS, Daya S, Jahad AR. The importance of quality primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews. Archives of Internal Medicine 1996;156:661‐6. [PUBMED: 8629879] - PubMed
Khan 2011
    1. Khan K, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence‐Based Medicine. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2011.
Light 1994
    1. Light RW. Pneumothorax. In: Murray JF, Nadel JA editor(s). Textbook of Respiratory Medicine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:2193‐210.
Light 2007
    1. Light RW. Pleural Diseases. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007.
MacDuff 2010
    1. MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax 2010;65(Suppl 2):ii18‐31. [PUBMED: 20696690 ] - PubMed
Maunder 1984
    1. Maunder RJ, Pierson DJ, Hudson LD. Subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Archives of Internal Medicine 1984;144:1447‐53. [PUBMED: 6375617] - PubMed
Melton 1979
    1. Melton LJ, Hepper NCG, Offord KP. Incidence of spontaneous pneumothorax in Olmsted County, Minnesota: 1950‐1974. American Review of Respiratory Disease 1979;29:1379‐82. [PUBMED: 517861] - PubMed
Mendis 2002
    1. Mendis D, El‐Shanawany T, Mathur A, Redington AE. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: are British Thoracic Society guidelines being followed?. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2002;78:80‐4. [PUBMED: 11807188] - PMC - PubMed
Miller 1987
    1. Miller KS, Sahn FA. Chest tubes: indications, technique, management and complications. Chest 1987;91:258‐64. [PUBMED: 3542404] - PubMed
Noppen 2001
    1. Noppen M, Alexander P, Driesen P, Slabbynck H, Verstraeten A. Quantification of the size of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: accuracy of the Light Index. Respiration 2001;68:396‐9. [PUBMED: 11464087] - PubMed
Noppen 2003
    1. Noppen M, Baumann MH. Pathogenesis and treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: an overview. Respiration 2003;70(4):431‐8. [PUBMED: 14512683] - PubMed
Noppen 2008
    1. Noppen M, Keukeleire T. Pneumothorax. Respiration 2008;76(2):121‐7. [PUBMED: 18708734 ] - PubMed
Noppen 2010
    1. Noppen M. Spontaneous pneumothorax: epidemiology, pathophysiology and cause. European Respiratory Review 2010;19(117):217‐9. [PUBMED: 20956196] - PMC - PubMed
Pasquier 2013
    1. Pasquier M, Hugil O, Carron P. Videos in clinical medicine. Needle aspiration of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. New England Journal of Medicine 2013;368(19):e24. [PUBMED: 23656667 ] - PubMed
Rawlins 2003
    1. Rawlins R, Brown KM, Carr CS, Cameron CR. Life threatening haemorrhage after anterior needle aspiration of pneumothoraces. A role for lateral needle aspiration in emergency decompression of spontaneous pneumothorax. Emergency Medicine Journal 2003;20:383‐4. [PUBMED: 12835367] - PMC - PubMed
RevMan 5.3 [Computer program]
    1. Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5) Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Ruckley 1966
    1. Ruckley CV, McCormack RJM. The management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Thorax 1966;21:139‐44. [PUBMED: 5935841] - PMC - PubMed
Sahn 2000
    1. Sahn SA, Heffner JE. Spontaneous pneumothorax. New England Journal of Medicine 2000;342(12):868‐74. [PUBMED: 10727592 ] - PubMed
Schramel 1996
    1. Schramel FM, Sutedja TG, Braber JC, Mourik JC, Postmus PE. Cost‐effectiveness of video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus conservative treatment for first time or recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. European Respiratory Journal 1996;9(9):1821‐5. [PUBMED: 8880097] - PubMed
Selby 1994
    1. Selby CD, Sudlow MF. Deficiencies of management of spontaneous pneumothoraces. Scottish Medical Journal 1994;39:75‐7. [PUBMED: 8720768] - PubMed
Soulsby 1998
    1. Soulsby T. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax: do we comply with them and do they work?. Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine 1998;15:317‐21. [PUBMED: 9785159] - PMC - PubMed
Stradling 1966
    1. Stradling P, Poole G. Conservative management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Thorax 1966;21:145‐9. [PUBMED: 5935842] - PMC - PubMed
Symbas 1989
    1. Symbas PN. Chest drainage tubes. Surgical Clinics of North America 1989;69:41‐6. [PUBMED: 2643182] - PubMed
Tschopp 2002
    1. Tschopp JM, Boutin C, Astoul P, Janssen JP, Grandin S, Bolliger CT, et al. Talcage by medical thoracoscopy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax is more cost‐effective than drainage: a randomised study. European Respiratory Journal 2002;20(4):1003‐9. [PUBMED: 12412696] - PubMed
Tschopp 2015
    1. Tschopp J, Bintcliffe O, Astoul P, Canalis E, Driesen P, Janssen J, et al. ERS task force statement: diagnosis and treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. European Respiratory Journal 2015;46:321‐35. [DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00219214; PUBMED: 26113675 ] - DOI - PubMed
Yeoh 2000
    1. Yeoh JH, Ansari S, Campbell IA. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax ‐ a Welsh survey. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2000;76:496‐9. [PUBMED: 10908379] - PMC - PubMed
Zehtabchi 2008
    1. Zehtabchi S, Rios CL. Management of emergency department patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax: needle aspiration or tube thoracostomy?. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2008;51(1):91‐100. [PUBMED: 18166436] - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Wakai 2003
    1. Wakai A, O'Sullivan RG, Deasy C, McCabe G. Simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004479] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Wakai 2007
    1. Wakai A, O'Sullivan R, McCabe G. Simple aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for primary spontaneous pneumothorax in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004479.pub2] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources