Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2017 Sep 7:2017:bcr2017220791.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-220791.

Bowel perforation presenting three months after suprapubic catheter insertion

Affiliations
Case Reports

Bowel perforation presenting three months after suprapubic catheter insertion

Thomas Stonier et al. BMJ Case Rep. .

Abstract

An 82-year-old male with multiple comorbidities, including previous laparotomies, had a suprapubic catheter (SPC) inserted under guidance with ultrasound and a flexible cystoscope. Three months following the procedure, having returned for a flexible cystoscopy for ongoing bladder pain syndrome, he became peritonitic postoperatively.A CT scan and subsequent laparotomy confirmed the SPC to be passing through a section of terminal ileum. The bowel was resected and he recovered well after a long hospital admission. A literature search found this delayed presentation of bowel perforation following SPC insertion to be rare, with only a few other cases reported. In particular, previous abdominal surgery increases the risk of this complication. This case serves as a reminder of the rare but potentially significant risk of SPC insertion and unusually highlights that this may not present immediately.

Keywords: catheterisation / catheter care; general surgery; urological surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A slice from the CT abdomen and pelvis showing the suprapubic catheter perforating the terminal ileum and entering the bladder.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A diagram representing the CT findings. Copyright and with permission from Ahmed et al.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A photograph taken in theatre showing the catheter entering the skin (bottom left of image), perforating the terminal ileum through a fibrosed track and entering the bladder (out of picture in centre of image).

References

    1. Ahmed SJ, Mehta A, Rimington P. Delayed bowel perforation following suprapubic catheter insertion. BMC Urol 2004;4:16 10.1186/1471-2490-4-16 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahluwalia RS, Johal N, Kouriefs C, et al. . The surgical risk of suprapubic catheter insertion and long-term sequelae. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:210–3. 10.1308/003588406X95101 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonasso PC, Lucke-Wold B, Khan U. Small bowel obstruction due to suprapubic catheter placement. Uro Case Rep 2016;7:72–3. 10.1016/j.eucr.2016.04.015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kass-lliyya A, Morgan K, Beck R, et al. . Bowel Injury after a routine change of suprapubic catheter. BMJ Case Rep 2012;2012:bcr2012006524 10.1136/bcr-2012-006524 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Witham MD, Martindale AD. Occult transfixation of the sigmoid colon by suprapubic catheter. Age and Aging 2002;31:407–8. 10.1093/ageing/31.5.407 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types