Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 7;7(1):10772.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11079-2.

The Deposition and Accumulation of Microplastics in Marine Sediments and Bottom Water from the Irish Continental Shelf

Affiliations

The Deposition and Accumulation of Microplastics in Marine Sediments and Bottom Water from the Irish Continental Shelf

Jake Martin et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Microplastics are widely dispersed throughout the marine environment. An understanding of the distribution and accumulation of this form of pollution is crucial for gauging environmental risk. Presented here is the first record of plastic contamination, in the 5 mm-250 μm size range, of Irish continental shelf sediments. Sixty-two microplastics were recovered from 10 of 11 stations using box cores. 97% of recovered microplastics were found to reside shallower than 2.5 cm sediment depth, with the area of highest microplastic concentration being the water-sediment interface and top 0.5 cm of sediments (66%). Microplastics were not found deeper than 3.5 ± 0.5 cm. These findings demonstrate that microplastic contamination is ubiquitous within superficial sediments and bottom water along the western Irish continental shelf. Results highlight that cores need to be at least 4-5 cm deep to quantify the standing stock of microplastics within marine sediments. All recovered microplastics were classified as secondary microplastics as they appear to be remnants of larger items; fibres being the principal form of microplastic pollution (85%), followed by broken fragments (15%). The range of polymer types, colours and physical forms recovered suggests a variety of sources. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms influencing microplastic transport, deposition, resuspension and subsequent interactions with biota.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A subset of recovered microplastics at 40–50x magnifications. (L) A frayed and tangled fibre from Galway Bay’s North Sound. (C) A heavily biofouled transparent fibre from the Aran Grounds. (R) A tangled ball of fibres identified during method testing from Galway Bay’s South Sound (52°57.722N, 9°33.358W).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Locations of sample sites and microplastics distributions (A). Hatched areas designate N. norvegicus habitat (data provided by Marine Institute Ireland). Fisheries stations are shown as triangles and remote stations as circles. Core replicates are shown at their alternating inspection intervals to the maximum depth of microplastic burial observed within the study (3.5 cm). Blue boxes represent water-sediment interfaces and red boxes represent contaminated sediment subsamples. Microplastic counts are shown within the boxes. Where replicates were not available they were represented through volume standardisation, shown here as the grey cores. (B) A depth profile of standardised microplastic counts shows the vertical distribution of contamination within the two study areas. Maps were produced in ArcGIS ESRI version 10.3. using the Ocean Basemap (http://goto.arcgisonline.com/maps/Ocean_Basemap). The main base map of Ireland was selected from within ArcGIS and the smaller insert map of Ireland was taken from OpenStreetMap contributors available under the Open Database Licence at www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl.originates.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Galgani, F., Hanke, G. & Maes, T. In Marine anthropogenic litter 29–56 (Springer, 2015).
    1. Jambeck JR, et al. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science. 2015;347:768–771. doi: 10.1126/science.1260352. - DOI - PubMed
    1. GESAMP. Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: part two of a global assessment Vol. 93 (Rep. Stud. GESAMP 2016).
    1. Cole M, Lindeque P, Halsband C, Galloway TS. Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: a review. Marine pollution bulletin. 2011;62:2588–2597. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sadri SS, Thompson RC. On the quantity and composition of floating plastic debris entering and leaving the Tamar Estuary, Southwest England. Marine pollution bulletin. 2014;81:55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.02.020. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types