Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun 12;4(1):e000175.
doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2016-000175. eCollection 2017.

Integrated care for resected early stage lung cancer: innovations and exploring patient needs

Affiliations
Review

Integrated care for resected early stage lung cancer: innovations and exploring patient needs

Jan Ho et al. BMJ Open Respir Res. .

Abstract

There is no consensus as to the duration and nature of follow-up following surgical resection with curative intent of lung cancer. The integration of cancer follow-up into primary care is likely to be a key future area for quality and cost-effective cancer care. Evidence from other solid cancer types demonstrates that such follow-up has no adverse outcomes, similar health-related quality of life, high patient satisfaction rates at a lower cost to the healthcare system. Core elements for successful models of shared cancer care are required: clear roles and responsibilities, timely effective communication, guidance on follow-up protocols and common treatments and rapid routes to (re)access specialist care. There is thus a need for improved communication between hospital specialists and primary care. Unmet needs for patients with early stage lung cancer are likely to include psychological symptoms and carer stress; the importance of smoking cessation may frequently be overlooked or underappreciated in the current hospital-based follow-up system. There is therefore a need for quality randomised controlled trials of patients with resected early stage lung cancer to establish optimal protocols for primary care-based follow-up and to more adequately address patients' and carers' unmet psychosocial needs, including the crucial role of smoking cessation.

Keywords: carcinoma; non-small cell; thoracotomy; evaluation health services; primary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. . Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:87–108.doi:10.3322/caac.21262 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verdecchia A, Francisci S, Brenner H, et al. . Recent cancer survival in Europe: a 2000-02 period analysis of EUROCARE-4 data. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:784–96.doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70246-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sugimura H, Nichols FC, Yang P, et al. . Survival after recurrent nonsmall-cell lung cancer after complete pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:409–18.doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.08.046 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brims F, McWilliams A, Fong K. Lung cancer screening in Australia: progress or procrastination? Med J Aust 2016;204:4–5.doi:10.5694/mja15.01109 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lou F, Huang J, Sima CS, et al. . Patterns of recurrence and second primary lung cancer in early-stage lung cancer survivors followed with routine computed tomography surveillance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145:75–82.doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.030 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources