Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 8;7(1):11017.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09593-4.

Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro

Affiliations

Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro

Beilei Ge et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Distillers grains are co-products of the corn ethanol industry widely used in animal feed. We examined the effects of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin at low concentrations reflective of those detected in distillers grains on bacterial resistance selection. At 0.1 µg/ml erythromycin, macrolide-resistant mutants were induced in one Campylobacter coli and one Enterococcus faecium strain, while these strains plus three additional C. coli, one additional E. faecium, and one C. jejuni also developed resistance when exposed to 0.25 µg/ml erythromycin. At 0.5 µg/ml erythromycin, a total of eight strains (four Campylobacter and four Enterococcus) obtained macrolide-resistant mutants, including two strains from each genus that were not selected at lower erythromycin concentrations. For penicillin, three of five E. faecium strains but none of five Enterococcus faecalis strains consistently developed resistance at all three selection concentrations. Virginiamycin at two M1:S1 ratios did not induce resistance development in four out of five E. faecium strains; however, increased resistance was observed in the fifth one under 0.25 and 0.5 µg/ml virginiamycin selections. Although not yet tested in vivo, these findings suggest a potential risk of stimulating bacterial resistance development in the animal gut when distillers grains containing certain antibiotic residues are used in animal feed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A schematic diagram showing the experimental design used in the erythromycin (ERY) selection experiment.

References

    1. U.S. Grains Council. A guide to distiller’s dried grains with solubles (DDGS) – 3rdEdition, http://www.grains.org/sites/default/files/ddgs-handbook/Complete%202012%... (2012).
    1. Renewable Fuels Association. Building partnerships growing markets: 2017 ethanol industry outlook, http://www.ethanolrfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Ethanol-Industry-Ou... (2017).
    1. Olmstead, J. Bugs in the system, https://www.iatp.org/sites/default/files/2012_05_02_AntibioticsInEthanol... (2012).
    1. Luther, M. Report of FY 2008 nationwide survey of distillers products for antibiotic residues, http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/Products/AnimalFoodFeeds/Contaminant... (2012).
    1. Luther, M. Report of FY 2010 nationwide survey of distillers products for antibiotic residues, http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/Products/AnimalFoodFeeds/Contaminant... (2012).

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources