Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct:46:198-202.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.586. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery

Riaz Ahmed Agha  1 , Mimi R Borrelli  2 , Martinique Vella-Baldacchino  3 , Rachel Thavayogan  4 , Dennis P Orgill  5 ; STROCSS Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery

Riaz Ahmed Agha et al. Int J Surg. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: The development of reporting guidelines over the past 20 years represents a major advance in scholarly publishing with recent evidence showing positive impacts. Whilst over 350 reporting guidelines exist, there are few that are specific to surgery. Here we describe the development of the STROCSS guideline (Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery).

Methods and analysis: We published our protocol apriori. Current guidelines for case series (PROCESS), cohort studies (STROBE) and randomised controlled trials (CONSORT) were analysed to compile a list of items which were used as baseline material for developing a suitable checklist for surgical cohort guidelines. These were then put forward in a Delphi consensus exercise to an expert panel of 74 surgeons and academics via Google Forms.

Results: The Delphi exercise was completed by 62% (46/74) of the participants. All the items were passed in a single round to create a STROCSS guideline consisting of 17 items.

Conclusion: We present the STROCSS guideline for surgical cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies consisting of a 17-item checklist. We hope its use will increase the transparency and reporting quality of such studies. This guideline is also suitable for cross-sectional and case control studies. We encourage authors, reviewers, journal editors and publishers to adopt these guidelines.

Keywords: Case-control studies; Cohort studies; Cross-sectional; Reporting guideline.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

    1. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Rajmohan S, et al. Preferred reporting of case series in surgery; the PROCESS guidelines. Int J Surg. 2016;36:319–323. - PubMed
    1. Agha RA, et al. A protocol for the development of the STROCSS guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J Surg Protoc. 2017;5:15–17. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468357417300323. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agha RA, Devesa M, Whitehurs K, et al. Levels of evidence in plastic surgery - bibliometric trends and comparison with five other surgical specialties. Euro J Plast Sur. 2016;39(5):365–370.
    1. Agha RA, Lee S, Jeong KJL, et al. Reporting quality of observational studies in plastic surgery needs improvement: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76(5):585–589. - PubMed
    1. Agha RA, Fowler AJ, Rajmohan S, et al. Preferred reporting of case series in surgery; the PROCESS guidelines. Int J Surg. 2016;36:319–323. - PubMed