Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;133(2):719-739.
doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1371-9. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

Explaining Accessibility and Satisfaction Related to Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Approach

Affiliations

Explaining Accessibility and Satisfaction Related to Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Approach

Pablo Cabrera-Barona et al. Soc Indic Res. 2017.

Abstract

Accessibility and satisfaction related to healthcare services are conceived as multidimensional concepts. These concepts can be studied using objective and subjective measures. In this study, we created two indices: a composite healthcare accessibility index (CHCA) and a composite healthcare satisfaction index (CHCS). To calculate the CHCA index we used three indicators based on three components of multidimensional healthcare accessibility: availability, acceptability and accessibility. In the indicator based on the component of accessibility, we included an innovative perceived time-decay parameter. The three indicators of the CHCA index were weighted through the application of a principal components analysis. To calculate the CHCS index, we used three indicators: the waiting time after the patient arrives at the healthcare service, the quality of the healthcare, and the healthcare service supply. These three indicators making up the CHCA index were weighted by applying an analytical hierarchy process. Three kinds of regressions were subsequently applied in order to explain the CHCA and CHCS indices: namely the Linear Least Squares, Ordinal Logistic, and Random Forests regressions. In these regressions, we used different independent social and health-related variables. These variables represented the predisposing, enabling, and need factors of people´s behaviors related to healthcare. All the calculations were applied to a study area: the city of Quito, Ecuador. Results showed that there are health-related inequalities in regard to healthcare accessibility and healthcare satisfaction in our study area. We also identified specific social factors that explained the indices developed. The present work is a mixed-methods approach to evaluate multidimensional healthcare accessibility and healthcare satisfaction, incorporating a pluralistic perspective, as well as a multidisciplinary framework. The results obtained can also be considered as tools for healthcare and urban planners, for more integrative social analyses that can improve the quality of life in urban residents.

Keywords: Accessibility; Composite index; Healthcare; Satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study area
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Methods workflow
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CHCA and CHCS average values in survey zones

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aday LA, Andersen RM. A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Services Research. 1974;9:208–220. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aday LA, Andersen R, Fleming GV. Health care in the U.S.: Equitable for whom? Berverly Hills, California: Sage; 1980.
    1. Andersen R. Health status indices and access to medical care. American Journal of Public Health. 1978;68(5):458–463. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.68.5.458. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1995;36:1–10. doi: 10.2307/2137284. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersen R, Newman J. Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization. The Milbank Quarterly. 2005;83(4):1–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00412.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources