Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;27(1):172-181.
doi: 10.1002/pro.3295. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

Dockground: A comprehensive data resource for modeling of protein complexes

Affiliations

Dockground: A comprehensive data resource for modeling of protein complexes

Petras J Kundrotas et al. Protein Sci. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Characterization of life processes at the molecular level requires structural details of protein interactions. The number of experimentally determined structures of protein-protein complexes accounts only for a fraction of known protein interactions. This gap in structural description of the interactome has to be bridged by modeling. An essential part of the development of structural modeling/docking techniques for protein interactions is databases of protein-protein complexes. They are necessary for studying protein interfaces, providing a knowledge base for docking algorithms, and developing intermolecular potentials, search procedures, and scoring functions. Development of protein-protein docking techniques requires thorough benchmarking of different parts of the docking protocols on carefully curated sets of protein-protein complexes. We present a comprehensive description of the Dockground resource (http://dockground.compbio.ku.edu) for structural modeling of protein interactions, including previously unpublished unbound docking benchmark set 4, and the X-ray docking decoy set 2. The resource offers a variety of interconnected datasets of protein-protein complexes and other data for the development and testing of different aspects of protein docking methodologies. Based on protein-protein complexes extracted from the PDB biounit files, Dockground offers sets of X-ray unbound, simulated unbound, model, and docking decoy structures. All datasets are freely available for download, as a whole or selecting specific structures, through a user-friendly interface on one integrated website.

Keywords: benchmark sets; protein recognition; protein-protein interactions; structure prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of interconnectivity between different Dockground modules and their relation to the external PDB. Stroked arrows represent future developments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dockground bound page, along with the Quick Downloads. The detailed search part is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dockground search screen and fragment of the corresponding search results.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Statistics on the basic (bound) part of Dockground. Normalization of data is with respect to the total number of PDB biounit files (A, B), the total number of chains (C), and the total number of pairwise complexes (C, D) in the database.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of complexes in the Weng's benchmark set 5 and the Dockground set 4. (A) Docking difficulty level (adopted from Ref. 19). Rigid‐body (or easy) cases correspond to the protein complexes with bound/unbound interface Cα RMSD (i‐RMSD) ≤ 1.5 Å; medium difficulty cases correspond to 1.5 < i‐RMSD < 2.2 Å; and difficult cases correspond to i‐RMSD >2.2 Å. (B) Functional categories of complexes, as in Ref. 19: EI, Enzyme‐Inhibitor; ES, Enzyme‐Substrate; ER, Enzyme complex with a regulatory or accessory chain; A, Antibody‐Antigen; AB, Antigen‐Bound Antibody; OG, Other, G‐protein containing; OR, Other, Receptor containing; and OX, Other, miscellaneous. The figure shows the absolute number of complexes in each category.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Example of docking decoys. False positive matches are shown by the ligand (smaller protein) center of mass (red) for 1f93 complex. The near‐native match is indicated by an arrow. The native structure of the complex is in cartoon representation.

References

    1. Petrey D, Honig B (2014) Structural bioinformatics of the interactome. Ann Rev Bioph 43:193–210. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mosca R, Pons T, Ceol A, Valencia A, Aloy P (2013) Towards a detailed atlas of protein–protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23:929–940. - PubMed
    1. Vakser IA (2013) Low‐resolution structural modeling of protein interactome. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23:198–205. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vakser IA (2014) Protein–protein docking: from interaction to interactome. Biophys J 107:1785–1793. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moal IH, Moretti R, Baker D, Fernandez‐Recio J (2013) Scoring functions for protein–protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23:862–867. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources