Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb:43:133-138.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

Development of a prediction model for long-term quality of life in critically ill patients

Affiliations

Development of a prediction model for long-term quality of life in critically ill patients

Sandra Oeyen et al. J Crit Care. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: We developed a prediction model for quality of life (QOL) 1 year after intensive care unit (ICU) discharge based upon data available at the first ICU day to improve decision-making.

Methods: The database of a 1-year prospective study concerning long-term outcome and QOL (assessed by EuroQol-5D) in critically ill adult patients consecutively admitted to the ICU of a university hospital was used. Cases with missing data were excluded. Utility indices at baseline (UIb) and at 1 year (UI1y) were surrogates for QOL. For 1-year non-survivors UI1y was set at zero. The grouped lasso technique selected the most important variables in the prediction model. R2 and adjusted R2 were calculated.

Results: 1831 of 1953 cases (93.8%) were complete. UI1y depended significantly on: UIb (P<0.001); solid tumor (P<0.001); age (P<0.001); activity of daily living (P<0.001); imaging (P<0.001); APACHE II-score (P=0.001); ≥80 years (P=0.001); mechanical ventilation (P=0.006); hematological patient (P=0.007); SOFA-score (P=0.008); tracheotomy (P=0.018); admission diagnosis surgical P<0.001 (versus medical); and comorbidity (P=0.049). Only baseline health status and surgical patients were positively associated with UI1y. R2 was 0.3875 and adjusted R2 0.3807.

Conclusion: Although only 40% of variability in long-term QOL could be explained, this prediction model can be helpful in decision-making.

Keywords: Critically ill patient; Intensive care; Long-term outcome; Prediction model; Quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources