Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;11(7):NC08-NC11.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25799.10213. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

Microperimetry - A New Tool for Assessing Retinal Sensitivity in Macular Diseases

Affiliations

Microperimetry - A New Tool for Assessing Retinal Sensitivity in Macular Diseases

Memota Laishram et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Macular disease is the leading cause of low vision in the Western world. Drusen and pigmentary irregularities are common among the rural Northern Indian population. The disease process leads to loss of central vision, metamorphopsia, macropsia or micropsia and colour vision defect.

Aim: To study the retinal sensitivity changes in macular diseases using microperimetry.

Materials and methods: It was an observational study, conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology at a rural tertiary care hospital. This study was started from December 2014 until June 2016, in all patients with macular disease above the age of 20 years attending the outpatient department. Microperimetry was done for 84 eyes of 52 patients with macular disease. Mean retinal Sensitivity (MS) and fixation stability was evaluated. The statistical analysis of mean retinal sensitivity, central 2° and 4° fixation was done by calculating the mean and standard deviation using 95% confidence interval.

Results: The range of age was between 20-81 years. Majority were 32 males (62%) and 20 females (38%). Out of the 84 eyes studied, majority of the macular disease were Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) (50%). Rest 50% were other macular diseases. The mean retinal sensitivity (dB) shown by microperimetry was 10.83 in AMD, 9.12 in Cystoid Macular Oedema (CME), 10.34 in Epiretinal Membrane (ERM), 10.74 in Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED), 8.96 in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSCR), 6.43 in macular dystrophy, 7.15 in Lamellar Hole (LMH), 9.8 in Pseudomacular Hole (PMH), 3 in geographic atrophy, 11.1 in macular telangiectasia, 5.6 in Berlin oedema, 12.3 in macular scar and 15.2 in haemorrhage in macula. The study showed 64% of the eyes had stable 2° central fixation, 35% had relatively unstable fixation and 1% had unstable fixation. No significant correlation between retinal sensitivity and retinal thickness in AMD was found.

Conclusion: This study shows that microperimetry can be a useful tool for objective evaluation of macular function and progression of the disease.

Keywords: Entoptic imagery; Macular function; Microperimetric examination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

[Table/Fig-1]:
[Table/Fig-1]:
Microperimetry performed in the central 9° with 25 stimulus points.
[Table/Fig-5]:
[Table/Fig-5]:
Scatter diagram showing retinal volume (mm3) and retinal sensitivity (dB) in AMD subjects.
[Table/Fig-6]:
[Table/Fig-6]:
Scatter diagram showing retinal thickness (microns) and retinal sensitivity (dB) in AMD subjects.

References

    1. Wiecek E, Lashkari K, Dakin SC, Bex P. Prevalence, patterns and repeatability of metamorphopsia in macular disease: a statistical analysis of 7,106 Amsler grids. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(2):431–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Minato H. Color vision defects of macular diseases. Nippon ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1991;95(4):354–62. - PubMed
    1. Jonas JB, Bourne RR, White RA, Flaxman SR, Keeffe J, Leasher J, et al. Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Visual impairment and blindness due to macular diseases globally: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Ophthal Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(4):808–15. - PubMed
    1. Bourne R, Stevens GA, White RA, Smith JL, Flaxman SR, Price H, et al. Causes of global visual loss:1990-2010. The global burden of disease study. Lancet Global Health. 2013;1(6):e339–49. - PubMed
    1. Hazel CA, Petre KL, Armstrong RA, Benson MT, Frost NA. Visual function and subjective quality of life compared in subjects with acquired macular disease. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2000;41:1309–15. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources