Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 11;14(1):122.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0572-1.

Food parenting practices for 5 to 12 year old children: a concept map analysis of parenting and nutrition experts input

Affiliations

Food parenting practices for 5 to 12 year old children: a concept map analysis of parenting and nutrition experts input

Teresia M O'Connor et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: Parents are an important influence on children's dietary intake and eating behaviors. However, the lack of a conceptual framework and inconsistent assessment of food parenting practices limits our understanding of which food parenting practices are most influential on children. The aim of this study was to develop a food parenting practice conceptual framework using systematic approaches of literature reviews and expert input.

Method: A previously completed systematic review of food parenting practice instruments and a qualitative study of parents informed the development of a food parenting practice item bank consisting of 3632 food parenting practice items. The original item bank was further reduced to 110 key food parenting concepts using binning and winnowing techniques. A panel of 32 experts in parenting and nutrition were invited to sort the food parenting practice concepts into categories that reflected their perceptions of a food parenting practice conceptual framework. Multi-dimensional scaling produced a point map of the sorted concepts and hierarchical cluster analysis identified potential solutions. Subjective modifications were used to identify two potential solutions, with additional feedback from the expert panel requested.

Results: The experts came from 8 countries and 25 participated in the sorting and 23 provided additional feedback. A parsimonious and a comprehensive concept map were developed based on the clustering of the food parenting practice constructs. The parsimonious concept map contained 7 constructs, while the comprehensive concept map contained 17 constructs and was informed by a previously published content map for food parenting practices. Most of the experts (52%) preferred the comprehensive concept map, while 35% preferred to present both solutions.

Conclusion: The comprehensive food parenting practice conceptual map will provide the basis for developing a calibrated Item Response Modeling (IRM) item bank that can be used with computerized adaptive testing. Such an item bank will allow for more consistency in measuring food parenting practices across studies to better assess the impact of food parenting practices on child outcomes and the effect of interventions that target parents as agents of change.

Keywords: Child; Concept mapping; Family; Food; Measurement; Nutrition; Parenting; Parenting practices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the University of British Columbia and Baylor College of Medicine.

Consent for publication

The Experts provided consent for participating in this study. Those acknowledged by name provided approval for us to acknowledge their participation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the Methods to Develop the Food Parenting Practice (FPP) Concept Map. *Based on systematic item bank and first round of binning/winnowing published by O'Connor et al. [4]. **Based on content map published by Vaughn et al. [11]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comprehensive solution for food parenting statements subjectively grouped into clusters, informed by the hierarchical cluster analysis and a published framework (Vaughn et al. [11]).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mitchell G, Farrow C, Haycraft E, Meyer C. Parental influences on children’s eating behaviour and characteristics of successful parent-focused interventions. Appetite. 2013;60:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larsen J, Hermans R, Sleddens E, Engels R, Fisher J, Kremers S. How parental dietary behavior and food parenting practices affect children's dietary behavior. Interacting sources of influence? Appetite. 2015;89:246–257. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berge J, Wall M, Bauer K, Neumark-Sztainer D. Parenting characteristics in the home environment and adolescent overweight: a latent class analysis. Obesity. 2010;18(4):818–825. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.324. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Connor T, Pham T, Watts A, et al. Development of an item bank for food parenting practices on published instruments and reports from Canadian and US parents. Appetite. 2016;103:386–395. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baranowski T, O'Connor T, Hughes S, et al. Houston. .. We have a problem! Measurement of parenting. Child Obes 2013;9(Suppl 1):S1-S4. - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding