Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 28:8:1443.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01443. eCollection 2017.

Circumventing the "Ick" Factor: A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Omitting Affective Attitudes Questions to Increase Intention to Become an Organ Donor

Affiliations

Circumventing the "Ick" Factor: A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Omitting Affective Attitudes Questions to Increase Intention to Become an Organ Donor

Sally Doherty et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Including or excluding certain questions about organ donation may influence peoples' intention to donate. We investigated the effect of omitting certain affective attitudinal items on potential donors' intention and behavior for donation. Design: A cross-sectional survey with a subgroup nested randomized trial. Methods: A total of 578 members of the public in four shopping centers were surveyed on their attitudes to organ donation. Non-donors (n = 349) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group 1 completed items on affective and cognitive attitudes, anticipated regret, intention, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control. Group 2 completed all items above but excluded affective attitudes. Group 3 completed all items but omitted negatively worded affective attitudes. The primary outcome was intention to donate, taking a donor card after the interview was a secondary behavioral outcome, and both were predicted using linear and logistic regression with group 1 as the reference. Results: Mean (SD) 1-7 intention scores for groups 1, 2 and 3 were, respectively: 4.43 (SD 1.89), 4.95 (SD 1.64) and 4.88 (SD 1.81), with group 2 significantly higher than group 1 (β = 0.518, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18 to 0.86).At the end of the interview, people in group 2 (66.7%; OR = 1.40, 95% CI 0.94 to 2.07, p = 0.096) but not those in group 3 (61.7%; OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.75, p = 0.685), were marginally more likely to accept a donor card from the interviewer than people in group 1 (59.7%). Conclusion: Omitting affective attitudinal items results in higher intention to donate organs and marginally higher rates of acceptance of donor cards, which has important implications for future organ donation public health campaigns.

Keywords: RCT; affective attitudes; organ donation; question behavior effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Participant flow-chart.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean intention to donate scores.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bartels R. D., Kelly K. M., Rothman A. J. (2010). Moving beyond the function of the health behaviour: the effect of message frame on behavioural decision-making. Psychol. Health 25 821–838. 10.1080/0887044092893708 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Behavioural Insights Team (2013). Applying Behavioural Insights to Organ Donation: Preliminary Results from a Randomised Control Trial. London: Cabinet Office.
    1. Brewer N. T., DeFrank J. T., Gilkey M. B. (2016). Anticipated regret and health behavior: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 35 1264–1275. 10.1037/hea0000294 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chatterjee P., Venkataramani A. S., Vijayan A., Wellen J. R., Martin E. G. (2015). The effect of state policies on organ donation and transplantation in the United States. JAMA Intern. Med. 175 1323–1329. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2194 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Death B. (2013). Organ Shortage: Current Status and Strategies for Improvement of Organ Donation - A European Consensus Document. Available at: http://www.edqm.eu/en/organtransplantation-reports-73.htm

LinkOut - more resources