Postoperative Rehabilitation Strategies Used by Adults With Cochlear Implants: A Pilot Study
- PMID: 28894803
- PMCID: PMC5510267
- DOI: 10.1002/lio2.20
Postoperative Rehabilitation Strategies Used by Adults With Cochlear Implants: A Pilot Study
Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis: Aural rehabilitation is not standardized for adults after cochlear implantation. Most cochlear implant (CI) centers in the United States do not routinely enroll adult CI users in focused postoperative rehabilitation programs due to poor reimbursement and lack of data supporting (or refuting) the efficacy of any one specific approach. Consequently, patients generally assume a self-driven approach toward rehabilitation. This exploratory pilot study examined rehabilitation strategies pursued by adults with CIs and associated these strategies with speech recognition and CI-specific quality of life (QOL).
Study design: Cross-sectional study of 23 postlingually deafened adults with CIs.
Methods: Participants responded to an open-ended questionnaire regarding rehabilitation strategies. A subset underwent in-depth interviews. Thematic content analysis was applied to the questionnaires and interview transcripts. Participants also underwent word recognition testing and completed a CI-related QOL measure. Participants were classified as having good or poor performance (upper or lower quartile for speech recognition) and high or low QOL (upper or lower quartile for QOL). Rehabilitation themes were compared and contrasted among groups.
Results: Five rehabilitation themes were identified: 1) Preimplant expectations of postoperative performance, 2) personal motivation, 3) social support, 4) specific rehabilitation strategies, and 5) patient-perceived role of the audiologist. Patients with good speech recognition and high QOL tended to pursue more active rehabilitation and had greater social support. Patient expectations and motivation played significant roles in postoperative QOL.
Conclusion: Postoperative patient-driven rehabilitation strategies are highly variable but appear to relate to outcomes. Larger-scale extensions of this pilot study are needed.
Keywords: Adult; auditory rehabilitation; cochlear implants; sensorineural hearing loss; thematic content analysis.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):699-706. doi: 10.1002/lary.25525. Epub 2015 Aug 8. Laryngoscope. 2016. PMID: 26256441
-
Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?Laryngoscope. 2018 Apr;128(4):959-966. doi: 10.1002/lary.26791. Epub 2017 Aug 4. Laryngoscope. 2018. PMID: 28776711 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive auditory rehabilitation in adults receiving cochlear implants: A pilot study.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Sep 1;5(5):911-918. doi: 10.1002/lio2.442. eCollection 2020 Oct. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 33134539 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life and speech perception in two late deafened adults with cochlear implants.Audiol Res. 2018 Mar 6;8(1):194. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2018.194. eCollection 2018 Mar 6. Audiol Res. 2018. PMID: 29725521 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear Implantation for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.Semin Hear. 2018 Nov;39(4):390-404. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1670705. Epub 2018 Oct 26. Semin Hear. 2018. PMID: 30374210 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Tablet-Based Telerehabilitation Versus Conventional Face-to-Face Rehabilitation After Cochlear Implantation: Prospective Intervention Pilot Study.JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Mar 12;8(1):e20405. doi: 10.2196/20405. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021. PMID: 33709934 Free PMC article.
-
Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients' Perspectives on Experiences With Music in Everyday Life: A Multifaceted and Dynamic Phenomenon.Front Neurosci. 2019 Nov 21;13:1229. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01229. eCollection 2019. Front Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31824240 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Implementation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Functional Staging System.Laryngoscope. 2022 Nov;132 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S1-S13. doi: 10.1002/lary.30381. Epub 2022 Sep 9. Laryngoscope. 2022. PMID: 36082873 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review of Auditory Training Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 11;13(2):400. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020400. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38256533 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Determinants of Cochlear Implant Satisfaction and Decisional Regret in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.Otol Neurotol. 2023 Dec 1;44(10):e722-e729. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004028. Epub 2023 Oct 19. Otol Neurotol. 2023. PMID: 37853774 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gaylor JM, Raman G, Chung M, et al. Cochlear implantation in adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;139:265–272. - PubMed
-
- Firszt JB, Holden LK, Skinner MW, et al. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear Hear 2004;25:375–387. - PubMed
-
- Gifford RH, Shallop JK, Peterson AM. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiol Neurootol 2008;13:193–205. - PubMed
-
- Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, et al. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;110:1150–1163. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources