Incidence and outcome of infective endocarditis following percutaneous versus surgical pulmonary valve replacement

Abstract

Objectives: To provide a comparison of the outcome of infective endocarditis (IE) in patients undergoing transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) versus surgical pulmonary valve replacement (SPVR).

Background: Although TPVR is thought to be associated with a higher risk of IE than SPVR, there is paucity of data to support this.

Methods: Patients who underwent TPVR or SPVR at UCLA between October 2010 and September 2016 were included and retrospectively analyzed.

Results: Three hundred forty-two patients underwent PVR at UCLA including 134 SPVR and 208 TPVR. Patients undergoing TPVR were more likely to have had a history of endocarditis than those undergoing SPVR (5.3% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.03) and a right ventricle to pulmonary artery (RV to PA) conduit (37% vs. 17%, P = 0.0001). Two SPVR and seven TPVR patients developed IE with a 4-year freedom from endocarditis of 94.0% in the SPVR versus 84% in the TPVR group (P = 0.13). In patients who underwent TPVR and developed endocarditis, the mean gradient across the RVOT prior to intervention was higher (28.1 ± 4.5 vs. 17.4 ± 0.6 mmHg, P = 0.02) and were more likely to have a conduit (71% vs. 36%, P = 0.049).

Conclusions: In this study, patients undergoing TPVR were not at a higher risk of IE than patients undergoing SPVR. TPVR patients were more likely to have had a prior history of IE and RV-PA conduit. The patients at highest risk were those with stenotic RV to PA conduits who were treated with TPVR.

Keywords: adults; congenital heart disease; endocarditis; pediatrics; percutaneous intervention; pulmonary valve disease; surgery; transcatheter valve implantation.