Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;21(1):41-56.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12619. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

Impact and experiences of delayed discharge: A mixed-studies systematic review

Antonio Rojas-García  1 , Simon Turner  1 , Elena Pizzo  1 , Emma Hudson  1 , James Thomas  2 , Rosalind Raine  1
Affiliations

Impact and experiences of delayed discharge: A mixed-studies systematic review

Antonio Rojas-García et al. Health Expect. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The impact of delayed discharge on patients, health-care staff and hospital costs has been incompletely characterized.

Aim: To systematically review experiences of delay from the perspectives of patients, health professionals and hospitals, and its impact on patients' outcomes and costs.

Methods: Four of the main biomedical databases were searched for the period 2000-2016 (February). Quantitative, qualitative and health economic studies conducted in OECD countries were included.

Results: Thirty-seven papers reporting data on 35 studies were identified: 10 quantitative, 8 qualitative and 19 exploring costs. Seven of ten quantitative studies were at moderate/low methodological quality; 6 qualitative studies were deemed reliable; and the 19 studies on costs were of moderate quality. Delayed discharge was associated with mortality, infections, depression, reductions in patients' mobility and their daily activities. The qualitative studies highlighted the pressure to reduce discharge delays on staff stress and interprofessional relationships, with implications for patient care and well-being. Extra bed-days could account for up to 30.7% of total costs and cause cancellations of elective operations, treatment delay and repercussions for subsequent services, especially for elderly patients.

Conclusions: The poor quality of the majority of the research means that implications for practice should be cautiously made. However, the results suggest that the adverse effects of delayed discharge are both direct (through increased opportunities for patients to acquire avoidable ill health) and indirect, secondary to the pressures placed on staff. These findings provide impetus to take a more holistic perspective to addressing delayed discharge.

Keywords: OECD; cost; delayed discharge; impact; outcome; qualitative; systematic review; timely discharge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart of the selection process for the delayed discharge review. *Two studies provided data on costs and quantitative variables.30, 32 †Three papers reported data from one study35, 36, 37
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. NSW Health PD, Health Services Performance Improvement Branch . In: Department of Health N, editor. Care Coordination: Planning from Admission to Transfer of Care in NSW Public Hospitals. Sydney, Australia: NSW Department of Health; 2011.
    1. Appropriate Level of Care: A Patient Flow, System Integration and Capacity Solution. 2006.
    1. Gaughan J, Gravelle H, Siciliani L. Delayed Discharges and Hospital Type: Evidence from the English NHS. Centre for Health Economics Research Paper; No. 133; 1‐27; 2016.
    1. Bates A. Delayed Transfers of Care in the NHS. In: Commons H, ed. 2015.
    1. Hospital discharge delays ‘cost NHS £100 m’. Health Serv J. 2014; Accessed February 16, 2016.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources