Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;19(2):151-164.
doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000573. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

The provider perspective: investigating the effect of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) mobile application and portal on primary care provider workflow

Affiliations

The provider perspective: investigating the effect of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) mobile application and portal on primary care provider workflow

Parminder K Hans et al. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Aim This qualitative study investigates how the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) mobile application and portal system, designed to capture patient-reported measures to support self-management, affected primary care provider workflows.

Background: The Canadian health system is facing an ageing population that is living with chronic disease. Disruptive innovations like mobile health technologies can help to support health system transformation needed to better meet the multifaceted needs of the complex care patient. However, there are challenges with implementing these technologies in primary care settings, in particular the effect on primary care provider workflows.

Methods: Over a six-week period interdisciplinary primary care providers (n=6) and their complex care patients (n=12), used the ePRO mobile application and portal to collaboratively goal-set, manage care plans, and support self-management using patient-reported measures. Secondary thematic analysis of focus groups, training sessions, and issue tracker reports captured user experiences at a Toronto area Family Health Team from October 2014 to January 2015. Findings Key issues raised by providers included: liability concerns associated with remote monitoring, increased documentation activities due to a lack of interoperability between the app and the electronic patient record, increased provider anxiety with regard to the potential for the app to disrupt and infringe upon appointment time, and increased demands for patient engagement. Primary care providers reported the app helped to focus care plans and to begin a collaborative conversation on goal-setting. However, throughout our investigation we found a high level of provider resistance evidenced by consistent attempts to shift the app towards fitting with existing workflows rather than adapting much of their behaviour. As health systems seek innovative and disruptive models to better serve this complex patient population, provider change resistance will need to be addressed. New models and technologies cannot be disruptive in an environment that is resisting change.

Keywords: complex care; mHealth; multi-morbidity; primary care provider; resistance; workflow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Typical primary care provider workflow: pre-visit, patient visit, and post-visit. Clinical Workflow Process Diagram adapted from Bowens et al. (2010) and Lee and Shartzer (: 1–2).

References

    1. Alsos O.A., Das A. and Svanæs D. 2012: Mobile health IT: the effect of user interface and form factor on doctor–patient communication. International Journal of Medical Informatics 81, 12–28. - PubMed
    1. Best A., Saul J. and Willis C. 2013: Doing the dance of culture change: complexity, evidence and leadership. Healthcare Papers 13, 64. - PubMed
    1. Bowens F.M., Frye P.A. and Jones W.A. 2010: Health information technology: integration of clinical workflow into meaningful use of electronic health records. Perspectives in Health Information Management. Journal of American Health Information Management Association 7, 1–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell E.M., Guappone K.P., Sittig D.F., Dykstra R.H. and Ash J.S. 2009: Computerized provider order entry adoption: implications for clinical workflow. Journal of General Internal Medicine 24, 21–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cresswell K. and Sheikh A. 2013: Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 82, e73–86. - PubMed

Publication types