Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 11;7(9):e016107.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016107.

What is the impact of research champions on integrating research in mental health clinical practice? A quasiexperimental study in South London, UK

Sherifat Oduola  1   2 , Til Wykes  2   3 , Dan Robotham  2   3 , Tom K J Craig  1   2
Affiliations

What is the impact of research champions on integrating research in mental health clinical practice? A quasiexperimental study in South London, UK

Sherifat Oduola et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Key challenges for mental health healthcare professionals to implement research alongside clinical activity have been highlighted, such as insufficient time to apply research skills and lack of support and resources. We examined the impact of employing dedicated staff to promote research in community mental health clinical settings.

Design: Quasiexperiment before and after study.

Setting: South London and Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust.

Participants: 4455 patients receiving care from 15 community mental health teams between 1 December 2013 and 31 December 2014.

Outcome measures: The proportion of patients approached for research participation in clinical services where research champions were present (intervention group), and where research champions were not present (comparison group).

Results: Patients in the intervention group were nearly six times more likely to be approached for research participation (Adj. OR=5.98; 95% CI 4.96 to 7.22).

Conclusions: Investing in staff that promote and drive research in clinical services increases opportunities for patients to hear about and engage in clinical research studies. However, investment needs to move beyond employing short-term staff.

Keywords: consent; mental health; psychosis; recruitment; research participation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison between control and intervention group for the proportion of patients asked C4C. C4C, Consent for Contact.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Department of Health. The NHS Constitution the NHS belongs to us all. London: HM Crown, 2013.
    1. Wykes T, Haro JM, Belli SR, et al. . Mental health research priorities for Europe. Lancet Psychiatry 2015;2:1036–42.10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00332-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel MX, Doku V, Tennakoon L. Challenges in recruitment of research participants. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2003;9:229–38.10.1192/apt.9.3.229 - DOI
    1. Howard L, de Salis I, Tomlin Z, et al. . Why is recruitment to trials difficult? An investigation into recruitment difficulties in an RCT of supported employment in patients with severe mental illness. Contemp Clin Trials 2009;30:40–6.10.1016/j.cct.2008.07.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robotham D, Riches S, Perdue I, et al. . Consenting for contact? Linking electronic health records to a research register within psychosis services, a mixed method study. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:1 110.1186/s12913-015-0858-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed