The Utility of Dual Energy Computed Tomography in Musculoskeletal Imaging
- PMID: 28900555
- PMCID: PMC5582533
- DOI: 10.4103/jcis.JCIS_46_17
The Utility of Dual Energy Computed Tomography in Musculoskeletal Imaging
Abstract
The objective of this article is to review the mechanisms, advantages and disadvantages of dual energy computed tomography (DECT) over conventional tomography (CT) in musculoskeletal imaging as DECT provides additional information about tissue composition and artifact reduction. This provides clinical utility in detection of urate crystals, bone marrow edema, reduction of beam hardening metallic artifact, and ligament and tendon analysis.
Keywords: Bone marrow edema; dual energy computed tomography; metallic artifact; musculoskeletal imaging; urate crystals.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Coupal T, Mallinson P, Munk P, McLaughlin P, A. Ouellette H. Latest Advances in Musculoskeletal Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) Current Radiology Reports. 2015;3
-
- Johnson TR. Dual-energy CT: General principles. Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(5 Suppl):S3–8. - PubMed
-
- Fritz J, Henes JC, Fuld MK, Fishman EK, Horger MS. Dual-energy computed tomography of the knee, ankle, and foot: Noninvasive diagnosis of gout and quantification of monosodium urate in tendons and ligaments. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2016;20:130–6. - PubMed
-
- Hu HJ, Liao MY, Xu LY. Clinical utility of dual-energy CT for gout diagnosis. Clin Imaging. 2015;39:880–5. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
