Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 8:3:32.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-017-0033-7. eCollection 2017.

Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry

Affiliations

Clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2 -node-positive breast cancer patients who were treated according to the Recurrence Score results: evidence from a large prospectively designed registry

Salomon M Stemmer et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. .

Abstract

The Recurrence Score® is increasingly used in node-positive ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer. This retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed registry evaluated treatments/outcomes in node-positive breast cancer patients who were Recurrence Score-tested through Clalit Health Services from 1/2006 through 12/2011 (N = 709). Medical records were reviewed to verify treatments/recurrences/survival. Median follow-up, 5.9 years; median age, 62 years; 53.9% grade 2; 69.8% tumors ≤ 2 cm; 84.5% invasive ductal carcinoma; 42.0% N1mi, and 37.2%/15.5%/5.2% with 1/2/3 positive nodes; 53.4% Recurrence Score < 18, 36.4% Recurrence Score 18-30, and 10.2% Recurrence Score ≥ 31. Overall, 26.9% received adjuvant chemotherapy: 7.1%, 39.5%, and 86.1% in the Recurrence Score < 18, 18-30, and ≥ 31 group, respectively. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for distant recurrence were 3.2%, 6.3%, and 16.9% for these respective groups and the corresponding 5-year breast cancer death estimates were 0.5%, 3.4%, and 5.7%. In Recurrence Score < 18 patients, 5-year distant-recurrence rates for N1mi/1 positive node/2-3 positive nodes were 1.2%/4.4%/5.4%. As patients were not randomized to treatment and treatment decision is heavily influenced by Recurrence Score, analysis of 5-year distant recurrence by chemotherapy use was exploratory and should be interpreted cautiously: In Recurrence Score < 18, recurrence rate was 7.7% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 27) and 2.9% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 352); P = 0.245. In Recurrence Score 18-30, recurrence rate in chemotherapy-treated patients (n = 102) was significantly lower than in untreated patients (n = 156) (1.0% vs. 9.7% P = 0.019); in Recurrence Score ≤ 25 (the RxPONDER study cutoff), recurrence rate was 2.3% in chemotherapy-treated (n = 89) and 4.4% in chemotherapy-untreated patients (n = 488); P = 0.521. In conclusion, our findings support using endocrine therapy alone in ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer patients with micrometastases/1-3 positive nodes and Recurrence Score < 18.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Salomon M. Stemmer reports receiving grant funding from Teva; receiving travel expenses from Genomic Health, Inc; and conducting research funded by Teva. Lior Soussan-Gutman reports being employed by and holding stock options in Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Avital Bareket-Samish reports being a consultant/medical writer for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Genomic Health Inc (including for the purpose of the current analysis), Bayer, and Roche. Christer Svedman, Debbie McCullough, and Steven Shak report being employed by Genomic Health and having stock ownership in Genomic Health. Christer Svedman, and Steven Shak report having intellectual property interest in Genomic Health. Steven Shak reports having a leadership role at Genomic Health. Noa Ben-Baruch reports receiving honoraria from Teva, and serving on the speaker’s bureau of Genomic Health. Marian Steiner, Shulamith Rizel, David B Geffen, Bella Nisenbaum, Tamar Peretz, Kevin Isaacs, Ora Rosengarten, Georgeta Fried, and Nicky Liebermann declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier distant recurrence curves by Recurrence Score (RS) groups and clinicopathological characteristics. Rates of distant recurrence for the entire cohort (a) and by nodal status (b), age (c) tumor size (d), and tumor grade (e). For each RS category, the percentage of patients receiving chemotherapy is indicated. The box under each graph presents the number of patients at risk at each time point. Results for the subgroup analyses (b–e) should be interpreted cautiously due to small number of patients in some of the subgroups, low event rates, and the potential for selection bias with respect to the patients being RS tested
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier breast cancer death curves by Recurrence Score (RS) groups in all patients. The box under the curve presents the number of patients at risk at each time point
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier distant recurrence (a) and breast cancer death (b) curves in chemotherapy-untreated patients with Recurrence Score (RS) < 18 and RS 18–30 who received hormone therapy. The box under each graph presents the number of patients at risk at each time point
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plots of 5-year distant recurrence risk (a) and 5-year breast cancer death (b) by adjuvant chemotherapy treatment

References

    1. Senkus E, et al. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2015;26:v8–v30. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv298. - DOI - PubMed
    1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Breast Cancer. Version 2.2016. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf. Accessed Jan 1, 2017.
    1. Coates AS, et al. Tailoring therapies-improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2015. Ann. Oncol. 2015;26:1533–1546. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv221. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris LN, et al. Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34:1134–1150. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.2289. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paik S, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;351:2817–2826. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041588. - DOI - PubMed