Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Feb;12(1):64-73.
doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0645-9. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

An international review and meta-analysis of prehabilitation compared to usual care for cancer patients

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

An international review and meta-analysis of prehabilitation compared to usual care for cancer patients

C Treanor et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to systematically review and synthesise randomised controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of prehabilitation compared to usual care for newly diagnosed, adult-onset cancer patients.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and SSCI were searched up to April 2017. Studies were included if disease-related, treatment-related, patient-reported and health service utilisation outcomes were assessed. Two reviewers independently reviewed and appraised the risk of bias of each study.

Results: Eighteen studies were included. Interventions comprised one or more of the following components: psychological support, education and exercise. Meta-analyses found that pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) significantly increased odds of continence at 3 months (OR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.57-6.91), but did not significantly reduce daily pad use at 6 months post-surgery Mean Difference (MD)= ( = - 0.96, 95% CI = - 2.04-0.12) for prostate cancer patients. Although quality of life improved due to PFMT, functional ability or distress did not. Further meta-analyses indicated that pre-surgical exercise significantly reduced length of hospital stay (MD = - 4.18, 95% CI = - 5.43-- 2.93) and significantly lowered odds of post-surgery complications (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.10-0.66) for lung cancer patients. Psychology-based prehabilitation significantly improved mood, physical well-being and immune function for prostate cancer patients and improved fatigue and psychological outcomes and a trend for better quality of life among breast cancer patients. Risk of bias was high for most studies.

Conclusions: Prehabilitation appears to benefit cancer patients. Rigorous trials are needed to investigate the effectiveness of prehabilitation among other cancer sites and other related effects. The cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation remains unanswered.

Implications for cancer survivors: Providing interventions earlier in the care pathway may lead to better outcomes for patients during survivorship.

Keywords: Cancer; Meta-analysis; Prehabilitation; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;92(8):715-27 - PubMed
    1. J Psychosom Res. 2000 Feb;48(2):187-94 - PubMed
    1. Health Expect. 2008 Dec;11(4):331-42 - PubMed
    1. Psychooncology. 2013 Mar;22(3):572-80 - PubMed
    1. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;17(5):461-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources