Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan;103(1):67-76.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.871. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

A Benefit-Risk Analysis Approach to Capture Regulatory Decision-Making: Multiple Myeloma

Affiliations
Review

A Benefit-Risk Analysis Approach to Capture Regulatory Decision-Making: Multiple Myeloma

G K Raju et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Drug regulators around the world make decisions about drug approvability based on qualitative benefit-risk analysis. In this work, a quantitative benefit-risk analysis approach captures regulatory decision-making about new drugs to treat multiple myeloma (MM). MM assessments have been based on endpoints such as time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) which are different than benefit-risk analysis based on overall survival (OS). Twenty-three FDA decisions on MM drugs submitted to FDA between 2003 and 2016 were identified and analyzed. The benefits and risks were quantified relative to comparators (typically the control arm of the clinical trial) to estimate whether the median benefit-risk was positive or negative. A sensitivity analysis was demonstrated using ixazomib to explore the magnitude of uncertainty. FDA approval decision outcomes were consistent and logical using this benefit-risk framework.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis of benefits and risks (a). First-line (b). Nonfirst-line. The naming convention for the points in the chart above is as follows: NNN-LL QQQQ-YY; where: NNN represents the first three letters in the name of the drug (e.g., “Len” for lenalidomide; LL represents the line of treatment (e.g., 1L indicating lenalidomide used as the first-line of treatment); QQQQ (if needed) is a description of a relevant subpopulation and/or specific pivotal trial; YY represents the year associated with the study/decision pertaining to the data point. The PFS improvement shown for the point Pan+Bor+Dex-2L-14* in Figure 1b is based on an assessment by an Independent Review Committee (IRC).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Benefit-risk of ixazomib plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sensitivity analysis of benefit-risk over control: ixazomib plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Evolution of estimated clinical outcome of OS benefit-risk over time for MM patients. The starting point for the blue line at year 2001 is taken as the estimated median OS of newly diagnosed MM patients prior to 1996 with the ratio of risk to benefit the same as that of thalidomide plus dexamethasone.

References

    1. Frey P Benefit-Risk Framework (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, CDER, Silver Spring, MD, 2012).
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Structured Approach to Benefit-Risk Assessment in Drug Regulatory Decision-Making. Washington, DC; 2013.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics Health, United States, 2010: With Special Feature on Death and Dying. Hyattsville, MD; 2011.
    1. Morris S, Rosenblatt M, Orloff J, Lewis-Hall F & Waldstreicher J The PCAST report: impact and implications for the pharmaceutical industry. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther 94, 300–302 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Woodcock J The PCAST Report on Pharmaceutical Innovation: implications for the FDA. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther 94, 297–300 (2013). - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances