Return of spontaneous circulation and long-term survival according to feedback provided by automated external defibrillators
- PMID: 28901546
- PMCID: PMC5698742
- DOI: 10.1111/aas.12992
Return of spontaneous circulation and long-term survival according to feedback provided by automated external defibrillators
Abstract
Background: We aimed to investigate the effect of automated external defibrillator (AED) feedback mechanisms on survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims. In addition, we investigated converting rates in patients with shockable rhythms according to AED shock waveforms and energy levels.
Methods: We collected data on OHCA occurring between 2011 and 2014 in the Capital Region of Denmark where an AED was applied prior to ambulance arrival. Patient data were obtained from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry and medical records. AED data were retrieved from the Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre (EMDC) and information on feedback mechanisms, energy waveform and energy level was downloaded from the applied AEDs.
Results: A total of 196 OHCAs had an AED applied prior to ambulance arrival; 62 of these (32%) provided audio visual (AV) feedback while no feedback was provided in 134 (68%). We found no difference in return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at hospital arrival according to AV-feedback; 34 (55%, 95% confidence interval (CI) [13-67]) vs. 72 (54%, 95% CI [45-62]), P = 1 (odds ratio (OR) 1.1, 95% CI [0.6-1.9]) or 30-day survival; 24 (39%, 95% CI [28-51]) vs. 53 (40%, 95% CI [32-49]), P = 0.88 (OR 1.1 (95% CI [0.6-2.0])). Moreover, we found no difference in converting rates among patients with initial shockable rhythm receiving one or more shocks according to AED energy waveform and energy level.
Conclusions: No difference in survival after OHCA according to AED feedback mechanisms, nor any difference in converting rates according to AED waveform or energy levels was detected.
© 2017 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Inverse Association Between Bystander Use of Audiovisual Feedback From an Automated External Defibrillator and Return of Spontaneous Circulation.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Feb 15;11(4):e023232. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023232. Epub 2022 Feb 12. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35156420 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic downloading and analysis of data from automated external defibrillators used in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation. 2014 Dec;85(12):1681-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.08.038. Epub 2014 Oct 2. Resuscitation. 2014. PMID: 25281188
-
Bystander automated external defibrillator application in non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation. 2019 Apr;137:168-174. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 18. Resuscitation. 2019. PMID: 30790694
-
Public Access Defibrillation: Great benefit and potential but infrequently used.Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.021. Epub 2015 Jul 30. Resuscitation. 2015. PMID: 26234893
-
Automated external defibrillator accessibility is crucial for bystander defibrillation and survival: A registry-based study.Resuscitation. 2019 Mar;136:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 22. Resuscitation. 2019. PMID: 30682401
Cited by
-
Adult Advanced Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.Resuscitation. 2020 Nov;156:A80-A119. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Oct 21. Resuscitation. 2020. PMID: 33099419 Free PMC article.
-
[Adult advanced life support].Notf Rett Med. 2021;24(4):406-446. doi: 10.1007/s10049-021-00893-x. Epub 2021 Jun 8. Notf Rett Med. 2021. PMID: 34121923 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
[Basic life support].Notf Rett Med. 2021;24(4):386-405. doi: 10.1007/s10049-021-00885-x. Epub 2021 Jun 2. Notf Rett Med. 2021. PMID: 34093079 Free PMC article. Review. German.
-
The Role of Different Feedback Devices in the Survival of Patients in Cardiac Arrest: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 8;13(19):5989. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195989. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39408049 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomarkers of brain injury after cardiac arrest; a statistical analysis plan from the TTM2 trial biobank investigators.Resusc Plus. 2022 Jun 2;10:100258. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100258. eCollection 2022 Jun. Resusc Plus. 2022. PMID: 35677835 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JGP, Koster RW. Global incidences of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 1479–87. - PubMed
-
- Atwood C, Eisenberg MS, Herlitz J, Rea TD. Incidence of EMS‐treated out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation 2005; 67: 75–80. - PubMed
-
- Gräsner JT, Herlitz J, Koster RW, Rosell‐Ortiz F, Stamatakis L, Bossaert L. Quality management in resuscitation–towards a European cardiac arrest registry (EuReCa). Resuscitation 2011; 82: 989–94. - PubMed
-
- Gräsner J‐T, Bossaert L. Epidemiology and management of cardiac arrest: what registries are revealing. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2013; 27: 293–306. - PubMed
-
- Perkins GD, Handley AJ, Koster RW, Castrén M, Smyth MA, Olasveengen T, Monsieurs KG, Raffay V, Gräsner J‐T, Wenzel V, Ristagno G, Soar J. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation section Collaborators. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation. Resuscitation 2015; 95: 81–99. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources