Randomized Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Pazopanib Versus Placebo After Nephrectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
- PMID: 28902533
- PMCID: PMC6018511
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.5324
Randomized Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Pazopanib Versus Placebo After Nephrectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Abstract
Purpose This phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of pazopanib versus placebo in patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk for relapse after nephrectomy. Patients and Methods A total of 1,538 patients with resected pT2 (high grade) or ≥ pT3, including N1, clear cell RCC were randomly assigned to pazopanib or placebo for 1 year; 403 patients received a starting dose of 800 mg or placebo. To address toxicity attrition, the 800-mg starting dose was lowered to 600 mg, and the primary end point analysis was changed to disease-free survival (DFS) for pazopanib 600 mg versus placebo (n = 1,135). Primary analysis was performed after 350 DFS events in the intent-to-treat (ITT) pazopanib 600 mg group (ITT600mg), and DFS follow-up analysis was performed 12 months later. Secondary end point analyses included DFS with ITT pazopanib 800 mg (ITT800mg) and safety. Results The primary analysis results of DFS ITT600mg favored pazopanib but did not show a significant improvement over placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.06; P = .165). The secondary analysis of DFS in ITT800mg (n = 403) yielded an HR of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.94). Follow-up analysis in ITT600mg yielded an HR of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.77 to 1.14). Increased ALT and AST were common adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation in the pazopanib 600 mg (ALT, 16%; AST, 5%) and 800 mg (ALT, 18%; AST, 7%) groups. Conclusion The results of the primary DFS analysis of pazopanib 600 mg showed no benefit over placebo in the adjuvant setting.
Figures






Comment in
-
Adjuvant Pazopanib Does Not PROTECT Against Recurrence of High-Risk, Initially Localized Renal Cell Cancer but Does Provide Novel Insights.J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3895-3897. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4242. Epub 2017 Oct 25. J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 29068785 No abstract available.
-
Re: Adjuvant Sunitinib in High-risk Renal-cell Carcinoma After Nephrectomy.Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):119-121. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.036. Epub 2018 Feb 9. Eur Urol. 2018. PMID: 29433972 No abstract available.
-
Re: Randomized Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Pazopanib versus Placebo after Nephrectomy in Patients with Localized or Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1393-1394. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.03.051. Epub 2018 Mar 20. J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29783587 No abstract available.
References
-
- Janzen NK, Kim HL, Figlin RA, et al. : Surveillance after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma and management of recurrent disease. Urol Clin North Am 30:843-852, 2003 - PubMed
-
- Messing EM, Manola J, Wilding G, et al. : Phase III study of interferon alfa-NL as adjuvant treatment for resectable renal cell carcinoma: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Intergroup trial. J Clin Oncol 21:1214-1222, 2003 - PubMed
-
- Clark JI, Atkins MB, Urba WJ, et al. : Adjuvant high-dose bolus interleukin-2 for patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma: A cytokine working group randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 21:3133-3140, 2003 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical