Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Jul;50(3):861-871.
doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.237. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

Combination of Tumor Volume and Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Improved Prognostic Stratification of Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Era: A Large-Scale Cohort Study

Qiu-Yan Chen  1   2 , Shao-Yan Guo  3 , Lin-Quan Tang  1   2 , Tong-Yu Lu  3 , Bo-Lin Chen  3 , Qi-Yu Zhong  3 , Meng-Sha Zou  3 , Qing-Nan Tang  1   2 , Wen-Hui Chen  1 , Shan-Shan Guo  1   2 , Li-Ting Liu  1   2 , Yang Li  1   2 , Ling Guo  1   2 , Hao-Yuan Mo  1   2 , Rui Sun  1   2 , Dong-Hua Luo  1   2 , Chong Zhao  1   2 , Ka-Jia Cao  1   2 , Chao-Nan Qian  1   2 , Xiang Guo  1   2 , Mu-Sheng Zeng  1 , Hai-Qiang Mai  1   2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Combination of Tumor Volume and Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Improved Prognostic Stratification of Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Era: A Large-Scale Cohort Study

Qiu-Yan Chen et al. Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: Little is known about combination of the circulating Epstein-Barr viral (EBV) DNA and tumor volume in prognosis of stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients in the intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era. We conducted this cohort study to evaluate the prognostic values of combining these two factors.

Materials and methods: By Kaplan-Meier, we compare the differences of survival curves between 385 patients with different EBV DNA or tumor volume levels, or with the combination of two biomarkers mentioned above.

Results: Gross tumor volume of cervical lymph nodes (GTVnd, p < 0.001) and total tumor volume (GTVtotal, p < 0.001) were both closely related to pretreatment EBV DNA, while gross tumor volume of nasopharynx (GTVnx, p=0.047) was weakly related to EBV DNA. EBV DNA was significantly correlated with progress-free survival (PFS, p=0.005), locoregional-free survival (LRFS, p=0.039), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, p=0.017), while GTVtotal, regardless of GTVnx and GTVnd, had a significant correlation with PFS and LRFS. The p-values of GTVtotal for PFS and LRFS were 0.008 and 0.001, respectively. According to GTVtotal and pretreatment EBV DNA level, patients were divided into a low-risk group (EBV DNA 0 copy/mL, GTVtotal < 30 cm3; EBV DNA 0 copy/mL, GTVtotal ≥ 30 cm3; or EBV DNA > 0 copy/mL, GTVtotal < 30 cm3) and a high-risk group (EBV DNA > 0 copy/mL, GTVtotal ≥ 30 cm3). When patients in the low-risk group were compared with those in the high-risk group, 3-year PFS (p=0.003), LRFS (p=0.010), and DMFS (p=0.031) rates were statistically significant.

Conclusion: Pretreatment plasma EBV DNA and tumor volume were both closely correlated with prognosis of stage II NPC patients in the IMRT era. Combination of EBV DNA and tumor volume can refine prognosis and indicate for clinical therapy.

Keywords: Epstein-Barr virus; Intensity modulated radiotherapy; Prognosis; Tumor burden; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest relevant to this article was not reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Progression-free survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis, comparing the undetectable Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA group with the detectable EBV DNA group (A), larger and smaller gross target volume of nasopharynx (GTVnx)+gross target volume of cervical lymph node (GTVnd) (GTVtotal) group (B), GTVnx group (C), and GTVnd group (D).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Progression-free survival (A), distant metastasis-free survival (B), and locoregional-free survival (C) by Kaplan-Meier analysis, comparing the low-risk group (Epstein-Barr virus [EBV] DNA 0 copy/mL, gross target volume of nasopharynx+ gross target volume of cervical lymph node [GTVtotal] < 30 cm3or ≥ 30 cm3; or EBV DNA > 0 copy/mL, GTVtotal < 30 cm3) and high-risk group (EBV DNA > 0 copy/mL, GTVtotal ≥ 30 cm3).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Differences between low-risk group (Epstein-Barr virus [EBV] DNA 0 copy/mL, gross target volume of nasopharynx+gross target volume of cervical lymph node [GTVtotal] < 30 cm3or ≥ 30 cm3; or EBV DNA > 0 copy/mL, GTVtotal < 30 cm3) and high-risk group (EBV DNA > 0 copy/mL, GTVtotal ≥ 30 cm3) in patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (A) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (B) for progression-free survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Choa G. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Some observations on the clinical features and technique of examination. Pac Med Surg. 1967;75:172–4. - PubMed
    1. Cao SM, Simons MJ, Qian CN. The prevalence and prevention of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China. Chin J Cancer. 2011;30:114–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee AW, Ng WT, Chan YH, Sze H, Chan C, Lam TH. The battle against nasopharyngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2012;104:272–8. - PubMed
    1. Wee JT, Ha TC, Loong SL, Qian CN. Is nasopharyngeal cancer really a "Cantonese cancer"? Chin J Cancer. 2010;29:517–26. - PubMed
    1. Chen QY, Wen YF, Guo L, Liu H, Huang PY, Mo HY, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1761–70. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources