Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 13;17(1):141.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0413-6.

Reporting of the translation and cultural adaptation procedures of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination version III (ACE-III) and its predecessors: a systematic review

Affiliations

Reporting of the translation and cultural adaptation procedures of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination version III (ACE-III) and its predecessors: a systematic review

Nadine Mirza et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: The ACE-III, a gold standard for screening cognitive impairment, is restricted by language and culture, with no uniform set of guidelines for its adaptation. To develop guidelines a compilation of all the adaptation procedures undertaken by adapters of the ACE-III and its predecessors is needed.

Methods: We searched EMBASE, Medline and PsychINFO and screened publications from a previous review. We included publications on adapted versions of the ACE-III and its predecessors, extracting translation and cultural adaptation procedures and assessing their quality.

Results: We deemed 32 papers suitable for analysis. 7 translation steps were identified and we determined which items of the ACE-III are culturally dependent.

Conclusions: This review lists all adaptations of the ACE, ACE-R and ACE-III, rates the reporting of their adaptation procedures and summarises adaptation procedures into steps that can be undertaken by adapters.

Keywords: Cognitive assessment; cognitive impairment; cognitive screening test; cultural adaptation; dementia; diagnosis; language; primary care; systematic review; translation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Manchester Translation Reporting Questionnaire (MTRQ) and Manchester Cultural Adaptation Reporting Questionnaire (MTRQ)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow diagram of the search process (PRISMA; Moher et al. [14])

References

    1. Mathuranath PS, Nestor PJ, Berrios GE, Rakowicz W, Hodges JR. A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2000;55:1613–1620. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000434309.85312.19. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nooone P. Questionnaire review: Adenbrooke’s cognitive examination III. Occup Med (Oxf) 2015;65:418–420. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqv041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, Arnold R, Hodges JR. The Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21:1078–1085. doi: 10.1002/gps.1610. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheung G, Clugston A, Croucher M, Malone D, Mau E, Sims A, Gee S. Performance of three cognitive screening tools in a sample of older New Zealanders. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27:981–989. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002889. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources