Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017:2017:5312960.
doi: 10.1155/2017/5312960. Epub 2017 Aug 21.

Predictors of Good Long-Term Renal Outcomes in Lupus Nephritis: Results from a Single Lupus Cohort

Affiliations

Predictors of Good Long-Term Renal Outcomes in Lupus Nephritis: Results from a Single Lupus Cohort

William A Fung et al. Biomed Res Int. 2017.

Abstract

This study aims to elucidate the predictive capabilities of proteinuria, serum creatinine (Cr), and urine RBCs (uRBCs) with respect to long-term renal outcomes in lupus nephritis (LN) in patients followed in clinic. Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with LN. We evaluated the ability of proteinuria, serum Cr, and uRBCs at 12 months to predict good long-term renal outcomes defined as serum Cr ≤ 100 mmol/L and kidney transplant/dialysis-free at the 7th year. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated for proteinuria, serum Cr, and uRBCs to study their ability to predict good long-term outcomes and to identify their best cut-off. Descriptive statistics studied the pattern of change of proteinuria and serum Cr. Results. Proteinuria of 0.6 g/d and Cr of 83 mmol/L performed independently moderately well in predicting good long-term renal outcomes while uRBC was less accurate. Combining serum Cr to proteinuria gave a small increase in positive predictive value with a trade-off in sensitivity. Proteinuria changed within the first year whereas serum Cr changed until the 7th year. Conclusions. Both proteinuria and Cr predict good long-term renal outcomes in LN. Proteinuria's ability to change faster at 12 months makes it a favorable endpoint for clinical trials and research studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curves for predictive value of proteinuria at 1 year for primary good long-term renal endpoints. Proteinuria at 1 year and percentage change from baseline to year 1 demonstrate departure from the line of unity, whereas absolute proteinuria from baseline to year 1 does not. In all ROC curves sensitivity is plotted on the y-axis against 1 − specificity on the x-axis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curves for predictive value of serum Cr at 1 year for primary good long-term renal endpoints. All the ROC curves for serum Cr demonstrate departure from unity with the best AUC of 0.82 for serum Cr value at year 1. Serum Cr 1 year and percentage change from baseline to year 1 demonstrate departure from the line of unity, whereas absolute proteinuria from baseline to year 1 does not.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves for predictive value of uRBCs at 1 year for primary good long-term renal endpoints. uRBCs at year 1 and uRBCs percentage change from baseline to year 1 demonstrate departure from the line of unity.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of the area under the curve (AUC) for proteinuria, uRBC, and serum Cr at 1 year quantified as the one year level, the change from baseline visit, and the percentage change from baseline.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Change in proteinuria during follow-up. After initiation of therapy at LN diagnosis, there is rapid decrease in 24H-P that remains relatively stable thereafter. LCLM lower confidence limit. UCLM upper confidence limit.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Change in serum Cr and eGFR during follow-up. After initiation of therapy at LN diagnosis, serum Cr and eGFR remain relatively unchanged until year 6.
Figure 7
Figure 7
ROC curves for predictive power of 24H-P at 1 year for primary renal outcomes in subgroup with baseline 24H-P ≥ 1 g/d.

References

    1. Bastian H. M., Roseman J. M., McGwin G., Alarcón G. S., Fessler B. J., Reveille J. D. Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups. XII. Risk factors for lupus nephritis after diagnosis. Lupus. 2002;11(3):152–160. doi: 10.1191/0961203302lu158oa. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henderson L. K., Masson P., Craig J. C., et al. Induction and maintenance treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2013;61(1):74–87. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.08.041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh J. A., Hossain A., Kotb A., Wells G. A. Comparative effectiveness of immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids for lupus nephritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews. 2016;5(1, article no. 155) doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0328-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Touma Z., Gladman D. D., Urowitz M. B., Beyene J., Uleryk E. M., Shah P. S. Mycophenolate mofetil for induction treatment of lupus nephritis: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Journal of Rheumatology. 2011;38(1):69–78. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100130. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wofsy D., Hillson J. L., Diamond B. Abatacept for lupus nephritis: Alternative definitions of complete response support conflicting conclusions. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2012;64(11):3660–3665. doi: 10.1002/art.34624. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources