Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May;79(5):2533-2541.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.26898. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

Steer-PROP: a GRASE-PROPELLER sequence with interecho steering gradient pulses

Affiliations

Steer-PROP: a GRASE-PROPELLER sequence with interecho steering gradient pulses

Girish Srinivasan et al. Magn Reson Med. 2018 May.

Abstract

Purpose: This study demonstrates a novel PROPELLER (periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction) pulse sequence, termed Steer-PROP, based on gradient and spin echo (GRASE), to reduce the imaging times and address phase errors inherent to GRASE. The study also illustrates the feasibility of using Steer-PROP as an alternative to single-shot echo planar imaging (SS-EPI) to produce distortion-free diffusion images in all imaging planes.

Methods: Steer-PROP uses a series of blip gradient pulses to produce N (N = 3-5) adjacent k-space blades in each repetition time, where N is the number of gradient echoes in a GRASE sequence. This sampling strategy enables a phase correction algorithm to systematically address the GRASE phase errors as well as the motion-induced phase inconsistency. Steer-PROP was evaluated on phantoms and healthy human subjects at both 1.5T and 3.0T for T2 - and diffusion-weighted imaging.

Results: Steer-PROP produced similar image quality as conventional PROPELLER based on fast spin echo (FSE), while taking only a fraction (e.g., 1/3) of the scan time. The robustness against motion in Steer-PROP was comparable to that of FSE-based PROPELLER. Using Steer-PROP, high quality and distortion-free diffusion images were obtained from human subjects in all imaging planes, demonstrating a considerable advantage over SS-EPI.

Conclusion: The proposed Steer-PROP sequence can substantially reduce the scan times compared with FSE-based PROPELLER while achieving adequate image quality. The novel k-space sampling strategy in Steer-PROP not only enables an integrated phase correction method that addresses various sources of phase errors, but also minimizes the echo spacing compared with alternative sampling strategies. Steer-PROP can also be a viable alternative to SS-EPI to decrease image distortion in all imaging planes. Magn Reson Med 79:2533-2541, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Keywords: GRASE; PROPELLER; Steer-PROP; diffusion imaging; k-space trajectory; phase correction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Different k-space sampling strategies in FSE-PROPELLER (a), Turboprop (b), X-PROP (c), and Steer-PROP (d). Only a segment of the pulse sequence between two consecutive refocusing RF pulses is shown. In FSE-PROPELLER (a), each spin echo is used to sample a k-space line in a blade. All spin echoes in a TR are used to sample a single PROPELLER blade. In Turboprop (b), X-PROP (c), and Steer-Prop (d), each spin echo is split into three gradient echoes. Turboprop uses all three gradient echoes to sample the same widened PROPELLER blade. X-PROP assigns the odd (solid lines) and even spin echoes (dash lines) into orthogonal blades and distributes all six blades evenly over an angular range of π, whereas Steer-PROP distributes the three gradient echoes to adjacent blades with a narrow angular range.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a): A segment of a Steer-PROP sequence illustrating steering gradient design for the special case of N = 3. (b): k-Space trajectory of the sequence segment in (a). Gx and Gy are used to denote readout (or X) and phase-encoding (or Y) gradients in a conventional sequence. Gxd1, Gxd2, Gyd1 and Gyd2 are the diffusion gradients on the X and Y axes as indicated. Gpe is a phase-encoding pulse for the spin echo, Gxro1 is the readout gradient pulse corresponding to the 1st gradient echo, Gxro2 and Gyro2 are the X and Y components corresponding to the 2nd gradient echo, Gxro3 and Gyro3 are the X and Y components corresponding to the 3rd gradient echo, Gxθ, Gyθ, Gx2θ, and Gy2θ are the steering gradient pulses, and Gxr and Gyr are the phase-rewinding pulses. The three k-space lines sampled by the three gradient echoes are illustrated as the white lines (denoted as b1, b2, and b3, respectively) in their respective color-coded blades. The curved arrow lines illustrate the effect of the steering gradient pulses or the rewinding gradient pulse on the k-space trajectory with the color of the lines corresponding to the same color of the gradient pulses in (a).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Steering gradient design using a gradient-echo train of 3 (N = 3). k-Space lines sampled by the three gradient echoes are denoted as b1, b2, and b3 in (a), (b), and (c), respectively. θ is the angle between two subsequent blades. φb1, φb2 and φb3 are the ending locations of k-space lines b1, b2, and b3, respectively. Gxθ, Gyθ, Gx2θ, and Gy2θ are the steering gradients as explained in the text. Rewinding gradient pulses (Gxr and Gyr ) return the k-space trajectory to the kx -axis as if steering had not happened. The Gyr rewinding pulse performs k-space traversal from point φb3 to its projection on the kx -axis (φyr) and the Gxr rewinding pulse performs k-space traversal from φyr to the starting location in the first blade (φxr).
Figure 4
Figure 4
A segment of Steer-PROP consisting of two repetition times (TRs or shots) denoted as 1st TR and 2nd TR. Three kinds of phase errors are shown: intra-blade (k-space lines within a single blade acquired by different spin echoes in the same echo train), inter-blade (among the blades acquired by the gradient echoes within a single spin echo), and inter-shot (between TRs) phase errors. Note that although the refocuses pulses are labeled as 180°, the actual flip angle was adjusted between 160° and 180° to stabilize the echo amplitudes in the spin-echo train.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of phantom images obtained at 3.0T using (a) FSE-PROPELLER and (b) Steer-PROP pulse sequences. The acquisition parameters were TR = 4s, effective TE = 72ms, M = 8, N = 3 (for Steer-PROP), number of shots = 16, FOV = 24cm, slice thickness = 5mm, bandwidth (BW) = ±125 kHz, matrix size = 256×256, and NEX = 2. The scan times for the two images were 6 mins 27 secs in (a) and 2 mins 9 secs in (b). The green and orange arrows on the Steer-PROP image indicate regions where signal and noise were measured, respectively, for SNR calculations.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Two slices of T2-weighted (a1, b1, a2, and b2) and diffusion-weighted (b = 750 s/mm2; c1, d1, c2, and d2) images from a human volunteer obtained at 1.5T using FSE-PROPELLER (first and third columns) and Steer-PROP (second and fourth columns) with TR = 4s, effective TE = 72ms, M = 8, N = 3 (for Steer-PROP), FOV = 24cm, slice thickness = 5mm, BW = ±62.5kHz, matrix size = 256×256, and NEX = 2.
Figure 7
Figure 7
T2-weighted images (TR = 4s, effective TE = 128ms, M = 8, N = 3 for Steer-PROP, matrix size = 256×256, FOV = 26cm, slice thickness = 5mm, and NEX = 2) of a healthy human volunteer obtained on a 3.0T scanner using (a) conventional Cartesian FSE, (b) FSE-PROPELLER, and (c) Steer-PROP. The subject’s head was moving randomly during all three scans.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Diffusion-weighted images (TR = 4s, effective TE = 72ms, M = 8, N = 3 for Steer-PROP, FOV = 24cm, slice thickness = 5mm, BW = ±125 KHz, matrix size = 256×256, NEX = 2, and b = 750 s/mm2) acquired on a 3.0T scanner using Steer-PROP (a–d) and SS-EPI (e–h) on axial (a, e), sagittal (b, f), coronal (c, g), and oblique (d, h) planes. The oblique slice orientation was selected to be in parallel to the cerebellar tentorium, ~ 40° from the axial plane. The sub-optimal image quality in (e) was a reflection of poor B0-field homogeneity. Even in the presence of B0-field homogeneity, a high quality Steer-PROP image in (a) was obtained.

References

    1. Pipe JG. Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: Application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1999;42(5):963–969. - PubMed
    1. Pipe JG, Farthing VG, Forbes KP. Multishot diffusion-weighted FSE using PROPELLER MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2002;47(1):42–52. - PubMed
    1. Deng J, Larson AC. Modified PROPELLER approach for T2-mapping of the abdomen. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2009;61(6):1269–1278. - PubMed
    1. Hirokawa Y, Isoda H, Maetani YS, Arizono S, Shimada K, Okada T, Shibata T, Togashi K. Hepatic lesions: improved image quality and detection with the periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction technique--evaluation of SPIO-enhanced T2-weighted MR images. Radiology. 2009;251(2):388–397. - PubMed
    1. Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. Elsevier Publishing; San Diego, CA: 2005.

Publication types