Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;14(4):3259-3264.
doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4868. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

Effect of intercostal nerve block combined with general anesthesia on the stress response in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery

Affiliations

Effect of intercostal nerve block combined with general anesthesia on the stress response in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery

Yanping Zhan et al. Exp Ther Med. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of intercostal nerve block combined with general anesthesia on the stress response and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS). A total of 30 patients scheduled for MIMVS were randomly divided into two groups (n=15 each): Group A, which received intercostal nerve block combined with general anesthesia and group B, which received general anesthesia alone. Intercostal nerve block in group A was performed with 0.5% ropivacaine from T3 to T7 prior to anesthesia induction. In each group, general anesthesia was induced using midazolam, sufentanil, propofol and vecuronium. Central venous blood samples were collected to determine the concentrations of cortisol, glucose, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) at the following time points: During central venous catheterization (T1), 5 min prior to cardiopulmonary bypass (T2), perioperative (T3) and 24 h following surgery (T4). Clinical data, including parameters of opioid (sufentanil) consumption, time of mechanical ventilation, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, visual analog scale scores and any complications arising from intercostal nerve block, were recorded. Levels of cortisol, glucose, IL-6 and TNF-α in group A were significantly lower than those in group B at T2 (all P<0.001; cortisol, P<0.05), T3 (all P<0.001) and T4 (all P<0.001; glucose, P<0.05), suggesting that intercostal nerve block combined with general anesthesia may inhibit the stress response to MIMVS. Additionally, intercostal nerve block combined with general anesthesia may significantly reduce sufentanil consumption (P<0.001), promote early tracheal extubation (P<0.001), shorten the duration of ICU stay (P<0.01) and attenuate postoperative pain (P<0.001), compared with general anesthesia alone. Thus, these results suggest that intercostal nerve block combined with general anesthesia conforms to the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery and may be suitable for clinical practice.

Keywords: general anesthesia; intercostal nerve block; minimally invasive mitral valve surgery; postoperative analgesia; stress response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Comparison of blood glucose levels between groups A and B at different time points. n=15. *P<0.05 and ***P<0.001 vs. group B; ###P<0.001 vs. T1. T1, at central venous catheterization; T2, 5 min before cardiopulmonary bypass; T3, perioperative; T4, 24 h after operation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Comparison of plasma cortisol levels between groups A and B. n=15. *P<0.05 and ***P<0.001 vs. group B; ##P<0.01 and ###P<0.001 vs. T1. T1, at central venous catheterization; T2, 5 min before cardiopulmonary bypass; T3, perioperative; T4, 24 h after operation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Comparison of postoperative recovery parameters between groups A and B. n=15. ***P<0.001 vs. group B; ###P<0.001 vs. T1. T1, at central venous catheterization; T2, 5 min before cardiopulmonary bypass; T3, perioperative; T4, 24 h after operation; IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arfanis K, Fioratou E, Smith A. Safety culture in anaesthesiology: Basic concepts and practical application. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011;25:229–238. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beilin B, Shavit Y, Trabekin E, Mordashev B, Mayburd E, Zeidel A, Bessler H. The effects of postoperative pain management on immune response to surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:822–827. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000078586.82810.3B. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rassias AJ, Procopio MA. Stress response and optimization of perioperative care. Dis Mon. 2003;49:522–554. doi: 10.1016/S0011-5029(03)00120-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Tiezzi A, Svampa MG, Bandiera G, Camilli S, Stillo F, Petasecca P, Sampogna F, Abeni D, Guerrini P. Perioperative stress response to carotid endarterectomy: The impact of anesthetic modality. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:1295–1304. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tabuchi T, Shimazaki J, Satani T, Nakachi T, Watanabe Y, Tabuchi T. The perioperative granulocyte/lymphocyte ratio is a clinically relevant marker of surgical stress in patients with colorectal cancer. Cytokine. 2011;53:243–248. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.10.004. - DOI - PubMed