Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;18(1):59-61.
doi: 10.7181/acfs.2017.18.1.59. Epub 2017 Mar 25.

Silicone Implant Sandwiched between Intact Nasal Bones with Fractured Nasal Bone Segments

Affiliations

Silicone Implant Sandwiched between Intact Nasal Bones with Fractured Nasal Bone Segments

Soo Hyun Woo et al. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

As the number of people who have undergone augmentation rhinoplasty has increased recently, nasal fractures are becoming more common after rhinoplasty. A silicone implant can affect the nasal fracture pattern, but there is no significant difference in treatment methods commonly. A 28-year-old female who had undergone augmentation visited our clinic with a nasal fracture. Computed tomography revealed that the silicone implant was sandwiched between the intact nasal bones with fractured bone fragments. In this case, open reduction was inevitable and a new silicone implant was inserted after reduction. Migration of the silicone implant beneath the nasal bone is a very rare phenomenon, but its accurate prevention and diagnosis is important because a closed reduction is impossible.

Keywords: Nasal bone; Rhinoplasty; Silicones.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Computed tomography findings before surgery. A silicone implant is sandwiched between the fractured nasal bone segments. The caudal end of the silicone implant has reached the nasal tip. Three-dimensional image (A) and sagittal image (B).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Appearance during surgery. A fracture line was observed after the implant sandwiched between the fractured nasal bone segments was removed.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Computed tomography findings after surgery. The nasal bones were set back in their original places. The new implant was inserted up to the nasion. Three-dimensional images (A), and sagittal images (B).

Similar articles

References

    1. Chen CT, Hu TL, Lai JB, Chen YC, Chen YR. Reconstruction of traumatic nasal deformity in Orientals. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:257–264. - PubMed
    1. Jeon SP, Kang SJ, Kim JW, Kim YH, Sun H. New nasal fracture classification for patients with silicone implants. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47:363–367. - PubMed
    1. Jung DH, Kim BR, Choi JY, Rho YS, Park HJ, Han WW. Gross and pathologic analysis of long-term silicone implants inserted into the human body for augmentation rhinoplasty: 221 revision cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1997–2003. - PubMed
    1. Lin HT, Day YJ, Sum DC, Liu FC, Liou JT. Displaced nasal silicone implant: an unusual cause of nasotracheal tube obstruction. J Clin Anesth. 2013;25:344–345. - PubMed
    1. Hwang K, You SH, Kim SG, Lee SI. Analysis of nasal bone fractures; a six-year study of 503 patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2006;17:261–264. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources