Health Professionals "Make Their Choice": Pharmaceutical Industry Leaders' Understandings of Conflict of Interest
- PMID: 28913595
- DOI: 10.1007/s11673-017-9804-y
Health Professionals "Make Their Choice": Pharmaceutical Industry Leaders' Understandings of Conflict of Interest
Abstract
Conflicts of interest, stemming from relationships between health professionals and the pharmaceutical industry, remain a highly divisive and inflammatory issue in healthcare. Given that most jurisdictions rely on industry to self-regulate with respect to its interactions with health professionals, it is surprising that little research has explored industry leaders' understandings of conflicts of interest. Drawing from in-depth interviews with ten pharmaceutical industry leaders based in Australia, we explore the normalized and structural management of conflicts of interest within pharmaceutical companies. We contrast this with participants' unanimous belief that the antidote to conflicts of interest with health professionals were "informed consumers." It is, thus, unlikely that a self-regulatory approach will be successful in ensuring ethical interactions with health professionals. However, the pharmaceutical industry's routine and accepted practices for disclosing and managing employees' conflicts of interest could, paradoxically, serve as an excellent model for healthcare.
Keywords: Conflict of interest; Disclosure; Neoliberalism; Pharmaceutical industry; Professionalism.
Similar articles
-
Combating corruption in the pharmaceutical arena.Indian J Med Ethics. 2018 Jul-Sep;3(3):234-239. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2018.022. Epub 2018 Mar 15. Indian J Med Ethics. 2018. PMID: 29550750
-
Decoding disclosure: Comparing conflict of interest policy among the United States, France, and Australia.Health Policy. 2018 May;122(5):509-518. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Mar 21. Health Policy. 2018. PMID: 29605526 Review.
-
From quid pro quo to quid pro bono: reshaping the influence of industry on health care epidemiologists.Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jan 1;50(1):93-7. doi: 10.1086/648723. Clin Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 19951230 Review.
-
Assessment by human research ethics committees of potential conflicts of interest arising from pharmaceutical sponsorship of clinical research.Intern Med J. 2007 Jan;37(1):12-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01234.x. Intern Med J. 2007. PMID: 17199839
-
Nurse practitioners' perceptions and participation in pharmaceutical marketing.J Adv Nurs. 2009 Mar;65(3):525-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04911.x. J Adv Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19222650
Cited by
-
Power to the People?J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Dec;14(4):457-459. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9819-4. Epub 2017 Nov 15. J Bioeth Inq. 2017. PMID: 29143188 No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical