Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Dec;59(12):1233-1239.
doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1922-z. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

Prospective intraindividual comparison of gadoterate and gadobutrol for cervical and intracranial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prospective intraindividual comparison of gadoterate and gadobutrol for cervical and intracranial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography

Philip Hoelter et al. Neuroradiology. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Gadobutrol (GB) is reported to provide improved relaxivity and concentration compared to gadoterate (GT). This study was designed to intraindividually compare quantitative and qualitative enhancement characteristics of GB to GT in cervicocranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of patients with cerebrovascular disease (CVD).

Methods: Patients (n = 54) with CVD underwent two identical contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) examinations of the cervical and intracranial vasculature in randomized order, using GB and GT in equimolar dose. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were obtained by two independent neuroradiologists, blinded to the applied contrast agents. Qualitative assessment was performed using a three-point scale with a focus on M1/M2 segments.

Results: One thousand and twenty-six vessel segments were analyzed. GB revealed a significantly higher SNR (p = 0.032) and CNR (p = 0.031) in all vessel segments. GB featured a significantly higher SNR and CNR in thoracic (p = 0.022; p = 0.016) and cervical vessels (p = 0.03; p = 0.038), as well as in the posterior circulation (p = 0.012; p = 0.005). In blinded qualitative assessment, overall preference was given to GB (p = 0.02), showing a significant better delineation of the M1/M2 segments (p = 0.041).

Conclusion: Compared to GT, the use of GB results in a significantly higher SNR and CNR in cervical and cerebral CE-MRA, leading to a better delineation of the intracranial vasculature. Present results underline the potential of GB for improved CE-MRA assessment of vasculature in CVD patients.

Keywords: Cerebrovascular disorders; Contrast media; Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA); Cranial vasculature; Diagnostic imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Sep;33(8):1427-35 - PubMed
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 May;17(5):565-71 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2016 Mar;26(3):820-8 - PubMed
    1. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Jul;38(1):36-40 - PubMed
    1. Invest Radiol. 2013 Mar;48(3):121-8 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources