Power, potential, and pitfalls in global health academic partnerships: review and reflections on an approach in Nepal
- PMID: 28914185
- PMCID: PMC5645653
- DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1367161
Power, potential, and pitfalls in global health academic partnerships: review and reflections on an approach in Nepal
Abstract
Background: Global health academic partnerships are centered around a core tension: they often mirror or reproduce the very cross-national inequities they seek to alleviate. On the one hand, they risk worsening power dynamics that perpetuate health disparities; on the other, they form an essential response to the need for healthcare resources to reach marginalized populations across the globe.
Objectives: This study characterizes the broader landscape of global health academic partnerships, including challenges to developing ethical, equitable, and sustainable models. It then lays out guiding principles of the specific partnership approach, and considers how lessons learned might be applied in other resource-limited settings.
Methods: The experience of a partnership between the Ministry of Health in Nepal, the non-profit healthcare provider Possible, and the Health Equity Action and Leadership Initiative at the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine was reviewed. The quality and effectiveness of the partnership was assessed using the Tropical Health and Education Trust Principles of Partnership framework.
Results: Various strategies can be taken by partnerships to better align the perspectives of patients and public sector providers with those of expatriate physicians. Actions can also be taken to bring greater equity to the wealth and power gaps inherent within global health academic partnerships.
Conclusions: This study provides recommendations gleaned from the analysis, with an aim towards both future refinement of the partnership and broader applications of its lessons and principles. It specifically highlights the importance of targeted engagements with academic medical centers and the need for efficient organizational work-flow practices. It considers how to both prioritize national and host institution goals, and meet the career development needs of global health clinicians.
Keywords: Global health; Nepal; health equity; partnership; training support.
Similar articles
-
Promoting More Equitable Global Health Research, Education, and Community Partnerships: The Efforts of One US‑Based Academic Institution.Ann Glob Health. 2025 Jun 11;91(1):31. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4772. eCollection 2025. Ann Glob Health. 2025. PMID: 40520133 Free PMC article.
-
Building and Sustaining Effective Partnerships for Training the Next Generation of Global Health Leaders.Ann Glob Health. 2021 Jul 12;87(1):66. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3214. eCollection 2021. Ann Glob Health. 2021. PMID: 34307069 Free PMC article.
-
The future of global health education: training for equity in global health.BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 21;16(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0820-0. BMC Med Educ. 2016. PMID: 27871276 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing how global health partnerships function: an equity-informed critical interpretive synthesis.Global Health. 2021 Jul 2;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00726-z. Global Health. 2021. PMID: 34215301 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Strengthening state/non-state service delivery partnerships in the health sector in Nepal.Int Health. 2015 Jul;7(4):228-38. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihv020. Epub 2015 Apr 15. Int Health. 2015. PMID: 25878212 Review.
Cited by
-
The Equity Tool for Valuing Global Health Partnerships.Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Apr 29;10(2):e2100316. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00316. Print 2022 Apr 28. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022. PMID: 35487557 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patterns of authorship on community health workers in low-and-middle-income countries: an analysis of publications (2012-2016).BMJ Glob Health. 2018 May 9;3(3):e000797. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000797. eCollection 2018. BMJ Glob Health. 2018. PMID: 29765777 Free PMC article.
-
Power analysis in health policy and systems research: a guide to research conceptualisation.BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11):e007268. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007268. BMJ Glob Health. 2021. PMID: 34740915 Free PMC article.
-
Qualitative research capacity building: Reflections from a UK-Kyrgyz Republic global partnership.J Glob Health. 2021 Dec 18;11:03127. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.03127. eCollection 2021. J Glob Health. 2021. PMID: 34956635 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A survey of self-reported research knowledge in Guyanese, Rwandan, Zambian, and Ethiopian anesthesia residents.Can J Anaesth. 2020 Sep;67(9):1307-1309. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01660-1. Epub 2020 Apr 28. Can J Anaesth. 2020. PMID: 32347458 No abstract available.
References
-
- Crane J. Scrambling for Africa? Universities and global health. Lancet. 2011;377:1388–9. - PubMed
-
- Networking and coalition building: lessons from a Latin American Network. COHRED learning brief. Geneva: Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED); 2000.
-
- McCoy D, Mwansambo C, Costello A, et al. Academic partnerships between rich and poor countries. Lancet. 2008;371:1055–1057. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical